discuss@lists.openscad.org

OpenSCAD general discussion Mailing-list

View all threads

I need to clarify scope better

GC
Gareth Chen
Sat, Jul 24, 2021 11:45 PM

Most, if not all slicers know to offset the extrusions to create
dimensionally accurate parts. If you're ending up with parts that are 0.2mm
big on every side that means you're out of calibration somehow. 0.2 is
probably a decent margin for fitting parts together, but not for that
reason.

On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 4:12 PM Gene Heskett gheskett@shentel.net wrote:

On Saturday 24 July 2021 18:12:22 nop head wrote:

Normal variables have lexical scope, which means they can be seen in
the current block and any nested block. $ variables have dynamic
scope, which means they can be seen in any module or function called
from the current block.

Eggxactly as my testing seems to confirm. thank you all.

My 6th printer is a prusa MK3S kit and its calibration seems to put a
line at the center of the .4mm nozzle, meaning if something needs to fit
inside of another part, but parts need to adjusted by .2mm in order to
put them together.  So thats the basis for using a .2 or -.2 fudge to
get good fittings.

[...]

Cheers, Gene Heskett

"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.


OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org

Most, if not all slicers know to offset the extrusions to create dimensionally accurate parts. If you're ending up with parts that are 0.2mm big on every side that means you're out of calibration somehow. 0.2 is probably a decent margin for fitting parts together, but not for that reason. On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 4:12 PM Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> wrote: > On Saturday 24 July 2021 18:12:22 nop head wrote: > > > Normal variables have lexical scope, which means they can be seen in > > the current block and any nested block. $ variables have dynamic > > scope, which means they can be seen in any module or function called > > from the current block. > > > Eggxactly as my testing seems to confirm. thank you all. > > My 6th printer is a prusa MK3S kit and its calibration seems to put a > line at the center of the .4mm nozzle, meaning if something needs to fit > inside of another part, but parts need to adjusted by .2mm in order to > put them together. So thats the basis for using a .2 or -.2 fudge to > get good fittings. > > [...] > > Cheers, Gene Heskett > -- > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: > soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." > -Ed Howdershelt (Author) > If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable. > - Louis D. Brandeis > Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene> > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org >
GH
Gene Heskett
Sun, Jul 25, 2021 12:39 AM

On Saturday 24 July 2021 19:45:21 Gareth Chen wrote:

Most, if not all slicers know to offset the extrusions to create
dimensionally accurate parts. If you're ending up with parts that are
0.2mm big on every side that means you're out of calibration somehow.
0.2 is probably a decent margin for fitting parts together, but not
for that reason.

I installed prusa's prusaslicer but that was a disaster, everything was
at least a mm oversized, and flow was 2x what it needed, so
i'm back to cura. It at least has some flow controls but I'm still fine
tuning the rest of it.

Thanks all.

Cheers, Gene Heskett

"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.

On Saturday 24 July 2021 19:45:21 Gareth Chen wrote: > Most, if not all slicers know to offset the extrusions to create > dimensionally accurate parts. If you're ending up with parts that are > 0.2mm big on every side that means you're out of calibration somehow. > 0.2 is probably a decent margin for fitting parts together, but not > for that reason. > I installed prusa's prusaslicer but that was a disaster, everything was at least a mm oversized, and flow was 2x what it needed, so i'm back to cura. It at least has some flow controls but I'm still fine tuning the rest of it. Thanks all. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable. - Louis D. Brandeis Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
M
MichaelAtOz
Sun, Jul 25, 2021 12:44 AM

Nophead's blog is full of interesting stuff, like this for holes:
https://hydraraptor.blogspot.com/2011/02/polyholes.html
&
https://hydraraptor.blogspot.com/2020/07/horiholes_36.html

Things to keep in mind in your designs.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gene Heskett [mailto:gheskett@shentel.net]
Sent: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 09:12
To: discuss@lists.openscad.org
Subject: [OpenSCAD] Re: I need to clarify scope better

On Saturday 24 July 2021 18:12:22 nop head wrote:

Normal variables have lexical scope, which means they can be seen in
the current block and any nested block. $ variables have dynamic
scope, which means they can be seen in any module or function called
from the current block.

Eggxactly as my testing seems to confirm. thank you all.

My 6th printer is a prusa MK3S kit and its calibration seems to put a
line at the center of the .4mm nozzle, meaning if something needs to fit
inside of another part, but parts need to adjusted by .2mm in order to
put them together.  So thats the basis for using a .2 or -.2 fudge to
get good fittings.

[...]

Cheers, Gene Heskett

"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.


OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

Nophead's blog is full of interesting stuff, like this for holes: https://hydraraptor.blogspot.com/2011/02/polyholes.html & https://hydraraptor.blogspot.com/2020/07/horiholes_36.html Things to keep in mind in your designs. > -----Original Message----- > From: Gene Heskett [mailto:gheskett@shentel.net] > Sent: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 09:12 > To: discuss@lists.openscad.org > Subject: [OpenSCAD] Re: I need to clarify scope better > > On Saturday 24 July 2021 18:12:22 nop head wrote: > > > Normal variables have lexical scope, which means they can be seen in > > the current block and any nested block. $ variables have dynamic > > scope, which means they can be seen in any module or function called > > from the current block. > > > Eggxactly as my testing seems to confirm. thank you all. > > My 6th printer is a prusa MK3S kit and its calibration seems to put a > line at the center of the .4mm nozzle, meaning if something needs to fit > inside of another part, but parts need to adjusted by .2mm in order to > put them together. So thats the basis for using a .2 or -.2 fudge to > get good fittings. > > [...] > > Cheers, Gene Heskett > -- > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: > soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." > -Ed Howdershelt (Author) > If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable. > - Louis D. Brandeis > Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene> > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
J
jon
Sun, Jul 25, 2021 12:47 AM

Gene:

PrusaSlicer has been PERFECT for me and my MK3S printers.  I encourage
you to give it another try.  PrusaSlicer and the MK3S are matched
together.  Is there any possibility that you specified something
incorrectly (like nozzle diameter or printer model number)?

Jon

On 7/24/2021 8:39 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:

On Saturday 24 July 2021 19:45:21 Gareth Chen wrote:

Most, if not all slicers know to offset the extrusions to create
dimensionally accurate parts. If you're ending up with parts that are
0.2mm big on every side that means you're out of calibration somehow.
0.2 is probably a decent margin for fitting parts together, but not
for that reason.

I installed prusa's prusaslicer but that was a disaster, everything was
at least a mm oversized, and flow was 2x what it needed, so
i'm back to cura. It at least has some flow controls but I'm still fine
tuning the rest of it.

Thanks all.

Cheers, Gene Heskett

Gene: PrusaSlicer has been PERFECT for me and my MK3S printers.  I encourage you to give it another try.  PrusaSlicer and the MK3S are matched together.  Is there any possibility that you specified something incorrectly (like nozzle diameter or printer model number)? Jon On 7/24/2021 8:39 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Saturday 24 July 2021 19:45:21 Gareth Chen wrote: > >> Most, if not all slicers know to offset the extrusions to create >> dimensionally accurate parts. If you're ending up with parts that are >> 0.2mm big on every side that means you're out of calibration somehow. >> 0.2 is probably a decent margin for fitting parts together, but not >> for that reason. >> > I installed prusa's prusaslicer but that was a disaster, everything was > at least a mm oversized, and flow was 2x what it needed, so > i'm back to cura. It at least has some flow controls but I'm still fine > tuning the rest of it. > > Thanks all. > > > Cheers, Gene Heskett
AM
Adrian Mariano
Sun, Jul 25, 2021 1:18 AM

Yeah, I also get great results with PrusaSlicer.  Are you aware that by
default it only exposes the "basic" settings?  If you enable the expert
settings there are tons of options.  But I would first see if you can find
settings tuned to your printer that somebody else has worked out.

On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 8:48 PM jon jon@jonbondy.com wrote:

Gene:

PrusaSlicer has been PERFECT for me and my MK3S printers.  I encourage
you to give it another try.  PrusaSlicer and the MK3S are matched
together.  Is there any possibility that you specified something
incorrectly (like nozzle diameter or printer model number)?

Jon

On 7/24/2021 8:39 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:

On Saturday 24 July 2021 19:45:21 Gareth Chen wrote:

Most, if not all slicers know to offset the extrusions to create
dimensionally accurate parts. If you're ending up with parts that are
0.2mm big on every side that means you're out of calibration somehow.
0.2 is probably a decent margin for fitting parts together, but not
for that reason.

I installed prusa's prusaslicer but that was a disaster, everything was
at least a mm oversized, and flow was 2x what it needed, so
i'm back to cura. It at least has some flow controls but I'm still fine
tuning the rest of it.

Thanks all.

Cheers, Gene Heskett


OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org

Yeah, I also get great results with PrusaSlicer. Are you aware that by default it only exposes the "basic" settings? If you enable the expert settings there are tons of options. But I would first see if you can find settings tuned to your printer that somebody else has worked out. On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 8:48 PM jon <jon@jonbondy.com> wrote: > Gene: > > PrusaSlicer has been PERFECT for me and my MK3S printers. I encourage > you to give it another try. PrusaSlicer and the MK3S are matched > together. Is there any possibility that you specified something > incorrectly (like nozzle diameter or printer model number)? > > Jon > > On 7/24/2021 8:39 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Saturday 24 July 2021 19:45:21 Gareth Chen wrote: > > > >> Most, if not all slicers know to offset the extrusions to create > >> dimensionally accurate parts. If you're ending up with parts that are > >> 0.2mm big on every side that means you're out of calibration somehow. > >> 0.2 is probably a decent margin for fitting parts together, but not > >> for that reason. > >> > > I installed prusa's prusaslicer but that was a disaster, everything was > > at least a mm oversized, and flow was 2x what it needed, so > > i'm back to cura. It at least has some flow controls but I'm still fine > > tuning the rest of it. > > > > Thanks all. > > > > > > Cheers, Gene Heskett > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org >
JB
Jordan Brown
Sun, Jul 25, 2021 1:30 AM

Prusaslicer rocks, for one very simple reason: "monotonic" fill of top
surfaces.
https://cdn.help.prusa3d.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/monotnic2-1536x943.jpg

Prusaslicer rocks, for one very simple reason: "monotonic" fill of top surfaces. https://cdn.help.prusa3d.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/monotnic2-1536x943.jpg
GH
Gene Heskett
Sun, Jul 25, 2021 5:14 AM

On Saturday 24 July 2021 20:47:52 jon wrote:

Gene:

PrusaSlicer has been PERFECT for me and my MK3S printers.  I encourage
you to give it another try.  PrusaSlicer and the MK3S are matched
together.  Is there any possibility that you specified something
incorrectly (like nozzle diameter or printer model number)?

Jon

I haven't nuked it, so I might give it another try, but from the looks of
the skirt or brim it was putting down with a 1st layer at .18mm,
(measured by peeling it off and miking it) it was squirting out and
laying down a nearly 1.75mm wide line .19mm thick from a .4mm nozzle,
and was throwing out blobs tall enough to catch the leveler probe, a
magnetic induction version, catching it hard enough to make x lose home.

I looked for flow controls ala cura style but didn't find any. So I went
back to cura. By setting cura flow to 90% and then setting it in the
printer to 85 or 90% there too, its a lot better, but the biggest diff
in getting a cleaner print, was cranking the speed up, way up, after the
1st layer is stuck, 250% was a good start. So I /think/ the 3rd pass at
part #2, on the bed now might be usable but has not yet been test
fitted. 2nd pass it all blew up, I wound up with a golf ball sized glop
of plastic welded to the hot block, Prusa didn't supply, nor do they
show one in use, a silicon sock for the hot block. I have a bag of them
and may try putting one on tomorrow just for S&G.

Thanks.
[...]

Cheers, Gene Heskett

"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.

On Saturday 24 July 2021 20:47:52 jon wrote: > Gene: > > PrusaSlicer has been PERFECT for me and my MK3S printers.  I encourage > you to give it another try.  PrusaSlicer and the MK3S are matched > together.  Is there any possibility that you specified something > incorrectly (like nozzle diameter or printer model number)? > > Jon > I haven't nuked it, so I might give it another try, but from the looks of the skirt or brim it was putting down with a 1st layer at .18mm, (measured by peeling it off and miking it) it was squirting out and laying down a nearly 1.75mm wide line .19mm thick from a .4mm nozzle, and was throwing out blobs tall enough to catch the leveler probe, a magnetic induction version, catching it hard enough to make x lose home. I looked for flow controls ala cura style but didn't find any. So I went back to cura. By setting cura flow to 90% and then setting it in the printer to 85 or 90% there too, its a lot better, but the biggest diff in getting a cleaner print, was cranking the speed up, way up, after the 1st layer is stuck, 250% was a good start. So I /think/ the 3rd pass at part #2, on the bed now might be usable but has not yet been test fitted. 2nd pass it all blew up, I wound up with a golf ball sized glop of plastic welded to the hot block, Prusa didn't supply, nor do they show one in use, a silicon sock for the hot block. I have a bag of them and may try putting one on tomorrow just for S&G. Thanks. [...] Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable. - Louis D. Brandeis Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
JB
Jordan Brown
Sun, Jul 25, 2021 5:16 AM

On 7/24/2021 10:14 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:

I looked for flow controls ala cura style but didn't find any.

Filament Settings / Filament / Extrusion Multiplier.  Visible only in
Advanced or Expert modes, not Simple mode.

On 7/24/2021 10:14 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > I looked for flow controls ala cura style but didn't find any. Filament Settings / Filament / Extrusion Multiplier.  Visible only in Advanced or Expert modes, not Simple mode.
GH
Gene Heskett
Sun, Jul 25, 2021 5:37 AM

On Sunday 25 July 2021 01:16:46 Jordan Brown wrote:

Spam detection software, running on the system "coyote.coyote.den",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.

Content preview:  On 7/24/2021 10:14 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > I
looked for flow controls ala cura style but didn't find any. Filament
Settings / Filament / Extrusion Multiplier.  Visible only in Advanced
or Expert modes, not Simple mode.

Content analysis details:  (5.7 points, 5.0 required)

pts rule name              description


-------------------------------------------------- 0.8 BAYES_50
BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4899]
0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
mail domains are different
0.0 SPF_NONE              SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE          BODY: HTML included in message
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not
necessarily valid
2.3 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_1    No description available.
0.1 DKIM_INVALID          DKIM or DK signature exists, but is not
valid 0.8 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a
host with no rDNS -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI    Multiple indicators
imply a widely-seen list manager
2.3 FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA    Forged mail pretending to be from Mozilla

The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe
to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a
virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam.  If you wish to
view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an
editor.

I saw that, and wondered what it might translate to.  Thanks Jordan

Cheers, Gene Heskett

"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.

On Sunday 25 July 2021 01:16:46 Jordan Brown wrote: > Spam detection software, running on the system "coyote.coyote.den", > has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original > message has been attached to this so you can view it or label > similar future email. If you have any questions, see > the administrator of that system for details. > > Content preview: On 7/24/2021 10:14 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > I > looked for flow controls ala cura style but didn't find any. Filament > Settings / Filament / Extrusion Multiplier.  Visible only in Advanced > or Expert modes, not Simple mode. > > Content analysis details: (5.7 points, 5.0 required) > > pts rule name description > ---- ---------------------- > -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 BAYES_50 > BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4899] > 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level > mail domains are different > 0.0 SPF_NONE SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record > 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message > 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not > necessarily valid > 2.3 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_1 No description available. > 0.1 DKIM_INVALID DKIM or DK signature exists, but is not > valid 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a > host with no rDNS -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators > imply a widely-seen list manager > 2.3 FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA Forged mail pretending to be from Mozilla > > The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe > to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a > virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to > view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an > editor. I saw that, and wondered what it might translate to. Thanks Jordan Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable. - Louis D. Brandeis Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
NH
nop head
Sun, Jul 25, 2021 8:23 AM

I calibrated my machines about 10 years ago and have always used Skeinforge
for slicing. Recently I printed some test pieces for checking the fit of my
countersink holes. The test blocks were an arbitrary 100 x 20mm and when
somebody was asking me about calibration I measured the outside to see how
well my settings had held over time. Amazed to find they are within 0.1mm
over 100mm and .02mm under 20mm, so with 0.1% and 0.1mm.

[image: IMG_20210323_212659826.jpg]
[image: IMG_20210323_212544674.jpg]

And I can fit a 2in object in a 2 in hole with soft plastic like ABS, it
will be a press fit. I leave a 0.2mm gap if I want them to fit without
binding. I don't call it a fudge, I call it clearance.

So I just design in OpenSCAD and print things and expect them to be the
size I specify.

On Sun, 25 Jul 2021 at 06:37, Gene Heskett gheskett@shentel.net wrote:

On Sunday 25 July 2021 01:16:46 Jordan Brown wrote:

Spam detection software, running on the system "coyote.coyote.den",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.

Content preview:  On 7/24/2021 10:14 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > I
looked for flow controls ala cura style but didn't find any. Filament
Settings / Filament / Extrusion Multiplier.  Visible only in Advanced
or Expert modes, not Simple mode.

Content analysis details:  (5.7 points, 5.0 required)

pts rule name              description


-------------------------------------------------- 0.8 BAYES_50
BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4899]
0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
mail domains are different
0.0 SPF_NONE              SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE          BODY: HTML included in message
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not
necessarily valid
2.3 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_1    No description available.
0.1 DKIM_INVALID          DKIM or DK signature exists, but is not
valid 0.8 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a
host with no rDNS -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI    Multiple indicators
imply a widely-seen list manager
2.3 FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA    Forged mail pretending to be from Mozilla

The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe
to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a
virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam.  If you wish to
view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an
editor.

I saw that, and wondered what it might translate to.  Thanks Jordan

Cheers, Gene Heskett

"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.


OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org

I calibrated my machines about 10 years ago and have always used Skeinforge for slicing. Recently I printed some test pieces for checking the fit of my countersink holes. The test blocks were an arbitrary 100 x 20mm and when somebody was asking me about calibration I measured the outside to see how well my settings had held over time. Amazed to find they are within 0.1mm over 100mm and .02mm under 20mm, so with 0.1% and 0.1mm. [image: IMG_20210323_212659826.jpg] [image: IMG_20210323_212544674.jpg] And I can fit a 2in object in a 2 in hole with soft plastic like ABS, it will be a press fit. I leave a 0.2mm gap if I want them to fit without binding. I don't call it a fudge, I call it clearance. So I just design in OpenSCAD and print things and expect them to be the size I specify. On Sun, 25 Jul 2021 at 06:37, Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> wrote: > On Sunday 25 July 2021 01:16:46 Jordan Brown wrote: > > > Spam detection software, running on the system "coyote.coyote.den", > > has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original > > message has been attached to this so you can view it or label > > similar future email. If you have any questions, see > > the administrator of that system for details. > > > > Content preview: On 7/24/2021 10:14 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > I > > looked for flow controls ala cura style but didn't find any. Filament > > Settings / Filament / Extrusion Multiplier. Visible only in Advanced > > or Expert modes, not Simple mode. > > > > Content analysis details: (5.7 points, 5.0 required) > > > > pts rule name description > > ---- ---------------------- > > -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 BAYES_50 > > BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4899] > > 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level > > mail domains are different > > 0.0 SPF_NONE SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record > > 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message > > 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not > > necessarily valid > > 2.3 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_1 No description available. > > 0.1 DKIM_INVALID DKIM or DK signature exists, but is not > > valid 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a > > host with no rDNS -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators > > imply a widely-seen list manager > > 2.3 FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA Forged mail pretending to be from Mozilla > > > > The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe > > to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a > > virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to > > view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an > > editor. > > I saw that, and wondered what it might translate to. Thanks Jordan > > Cheers, Gene Heskett > -- > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: > soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." > -Ed Howdershelt (Author) > If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable. > - Louis D. Brandeis > Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene> > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org >