Hi,
Has anyone upgraded from 4 to 16 gigabytes of DDR and found that they can
process much larger .scad files? Does the memory inflate exponentially or is
there a roughly linear balance in between the number of CGAL functions used
and the memory used?
Can you put a figure, say, "my 16gig pc managed to union 500 spheres with
radius 10 without bugging"
because i can union about 4000 simple 4-20 vertex objects with 4 gigs of
ram, but it tends to crash with 100 vertex spheres if i have 200 of them or
something.
--
View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/How-much-memory-do-you-have-and-what-csg-limits-does-it-give-you-tp14068.html
Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
Has anyone upgraded from 4 to 16 gigabytes of DDR and found that they can
process much larger .scad files? Does the memory inflate exponentially or is
there a roughly linear balance in between the number of CGAL functions used
and the memory used?
Can you put a figure, say, "my 16gig pc managed to union 500 spheres with
radius 10 without bugging"
because i can union about 4000 simple 4-20 vertex objects with 4 gigs of
ram, but it tends to crash with 100 vertex spheres if i have 200 of them or
something.
--
View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/How-much-memory-do-you-have-and-what-csg-limits-does-it-give-you-tp14068.html
Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.