nop head: Are there meant to be images attached? (I saw those in Michael's post.) I'm following along here as I've frequently had puzzling results when using #, or combinations of # and ! Attributed to a gap in my know how, but... Terry Monday 21 February 2022, 1052 On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:42:01 +0000, you wrote: >The orange colour is because it is drawing it twice, once solid yellow and >then transparent pink. > >CSG before normalization: > >(cube2 + cube8) > > >CSG after normalization: > >(cube2 + cube8) > > >CSG rendering chain: > >+cube2 > >+cube8 > > >Highlights CSG rendering chain: > >+cube6 > >+cube2 > >+cube8 > > >Without the first # it does this: > >CSG before normalization: > >cube2 > >CSG after normalization: > >cube2 > >CSG rendering chain: > >+cube2 > >Highlights CSG rendering chain: > >+cube6 > >+cube8 > >I.e. it draws cube2 normally and highlights the other two. It only seems to >go wrong when all cubes are highlighted. Adding an extra one fixes it until >you also highlight that. > > > >On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 at 06:27, MichaelAtOz <oz.at.michael@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The translucency is important for debugging. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From:* Jordan Brown [mailto:openscad@jordan.maileater.net] >> >> In some ways I think the orange-ish color, ugly as it may be, is better >> for a highlighted solid object, to make the distinction between a >> highlighted solid object and a highlighted empty space clearer. But that >> doesn't excuse changing the color displayed for an unrelated object! >> >> >> >> >> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> Virus-free. >> www.avg.com >> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> >> <#m_8842330204752686170_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenSCAD mailing list >> To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org >>

No I didn't attach any images, just the CSG results, which explain why the cubes in previous posts are the wrong colour. It seems to be a bug when all items are highlighted. On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 at 10:52, Terry <terrypingm@gmail.com> wrote: > nop head: Are there meant to be images attached? > (I saw those in Michael's post.) > > I'm following along here as I've frequently had puzzling results when > using #, > or combinations of # and ! Attributed to a gap in my know how, but... > > Terry > Monday 21 February 2022, 1052 > > > On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:42:01 +0000, you wrote: > > >The orange colour is because it is drawing it twice, once solid yellow and > >then transparent pink. > > > >CSG before normalization: > > > >(cube2 + cube8) > > > > > >CSG after normalization: > > > >(cube2 + cube8) > > > > > >CSG rendering chain: > > > >+cube2 > > > >+cube8 > > > > > >Highlights CSG rendering chain: > > > >+cube6 > > > >+cube2 > > > >+cube8 > > > > > >Without the first # it does this: > > > >CSG before normalization: > > > >cube2 > > > >CSG after normalization: > > > >cube2 > > > >CSG rendering chain: > > > >+cube2 > > > >Highlights CSG rendering chain: > > > >+cube6 > > > >+cube8 > > > >I.e. it draws cube2 normally and highlights the other two. It only seems > to > >go wrong when all cubes are highlighted. Adding an extra one fixes it > until > >you also highlight that. > > > > > > > >On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 at 06:27, MichaelAtOz <oz.at.michael@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> The translucency is important for debugging. > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------ > >> > >> *From:* Jordan Brown [mailto:openscad@jordan.maileater.net] > >> > >> In some ways I think the orange-ish color, ugly as it may be, is better > >> for a highlighted solid object, to make the distinction between a > >> highlighted solid object and a highlighted empty space clearer. But > that > >> doesn't excuse changing the color displayed for an unrelated object! > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> < > http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > Virus-free. > >> www.avg.com > >> < > http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient > > > >> <#m_8842330204752686170_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OpenSCAD mailing list > >> To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org > >> > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org >

On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 11:01:20 +0000, you wrote: >No I didn't attach any images, just the CSG results, which explain why the >cubes in previous posts are the wrong colour. It seems to be a bug when all >items are highlighted. Thanks, understood. >On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 at 10:52, Terry <terrypingm@gmail.com> wrote: > >> nop head: Are there meant to be images attached? >> (I saw those in Michael's post.) >> >> I'm following along here as I've frequently had puzzling results when >> using #, >> or combinations of # and ! Attributed to a gap in my know how, but... TYPO: That should have been: ...or combinations of # and % >> >> Terry >> Monday 21 February 2022, 1052