discuss@lists.openscad.org

OpenSCAD general discussion Mailing-list

View all threads

OpenSCAD release candidate: 2020.12-RC2

L
lar3ry
Fri, Dec 11, 2020 5:04 PM

nophead wrote

Here is an example where the RC is 3 times slower than the release.
https://github.com/nophead/NopSCADlib/blob/master/tests/pulleys.scad

OpenSCAD 2019.05
Geometries in cache: 259
Geometry cache size in bytes: 7707888
CGAL Polyhedrons in cache: 9
CGAL cache size in bytes: 5571112
Total rendering time: 0 hours, 0 minutes, 4 seconds

OpenSCAD 2020.12-RC2
Geometries in cache: 245
Geometry cache size in bytes: 5961344
CGAL Polyhedrons in cache: 23
CGAL cache size in bytes: 21865784
Total rendering time: 0:00:12.699

Yes, the rendering is slower, but I was more startled by the differences in
the lines quoted above.
I think I understand the differences in cache sizes, but I don't understand
the differences in geometries and CGAL Polyhedrons

--
Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/

nophead wrote > Here is an example where the RC is 3 times slower than the release. > https://github.com/nophead/NopSCADlib/blob/master/tests/pulleys.scad > > OpenSCAD 2019.05 > Geometries in cache: 259 > Geometry cache size in bytes: 7707888 > CGAL Polyhedrons in cache: 9 > CGAL cache size in bytes: 5571112 > Total rendering time: 0 hours, 0 minutes, 4 seconds > > OpenSCAD 2020.12-RC2 > Geometries in cache: 245 > Geometry cache size in bytes: 5961344 > CGAL Polyhedrons in cache: 23 > CGAL cache size in bytes: 21865784 > Total rendering time: 0:00:12.699 Yes, the rendering is slower, but I was more startled by the differences in the lines quoted above. I think I understand the differences in cache sizes, but I don't understand the differences in geometries and CGAL Polyhedrons -- Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/
NH
nop head
Fri, Dec 11, 2020 7:13 PM

Yes I think that is a clue to the difference in speed but the end result
looks the same when shown as a PNG.

On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 17:05, lar3ry lar3ry@sasktel.net wrote:

nophead wrote

Here is an example where the RC is 3 times slower than the release.
https://github.com/nophead/NopSCADlib/blob/master/tests/pulleys.scad

OpenSCAD 2019.05
Geometries in cache: 259
Geometry cache size in bytes: 7707888
CGAL Polyhedrons in cache: 9
CGAL cache size in bytes: 5571112
Total rendering time: 0 hours, 0 minutes, 4 seconds

OpenSCAD 2020.12-RC2
Geometries in cache: 245
Geometry cache size in bytes: 5961344
CGAL Polyhedrons in cache: 23
CGAL cache size in bytes: 21865784
Total rendering time: 0:00:12.699

Yes, the rendering is slower, but I was more startled by the differences in
the lines quoted above.
I think I understand the differences in cache sizes, but I don't understand
the differences in geometries and CGAL Polyhedrons

--
Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/


OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org

Yes I think that is a clue to the difference in speed but the end result looks the same when shown as a PNG. On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 17:05, lar3ry <lar3ry@sasktel.net> wrote: > nophead wrote > > Here is an example where the RC is 3 times slower than the release. > > https://github.com/nophead/NopSCADlib/blob/master/tests/pulleys.scad > > > > OpenSCAD 2019.05 > > Geometries in cache: 259 > > Geometry cache size in bytes: 7707888 > > CGAL Polyhedrons in cache: 9 > > CGAL cache size in bytes: 5571112 > > Total rendering time: 0 hours, 0 minutes, 4 seconds > > > > OpenSCAD 2020.12-RC2 > > Geometries in cache: 245 > > Geometry cache size in bytes: 5961344 > > CGAL Polyhedrons in cache: 23 > > CGAL cache size in bytes: 21865784 > > Total rendering time: 0:00:12.699 > > Yes, the rendering is slower, but I was more startled by the differences in > the lines quoted above. > I think I understand the differences in cache sizes, but I don't understand > the differences in geometries and CGAL Polyhedrons > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > Discuss@lists.openscad.org > http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org >
RD
Revar Desmera
Fri, Dec 11, 2020 11:34 PM

I’m on Mac OS Catalina 10.15.7, trying out OpenSCAD snapshot 2020.12.11.
I cannot seem to open files into a new tab.  My current existing tab always gets replaced by the new file tab.  This isn’t making a new window or anything like that.  When I do try to open into a new window that works fine.  It’s just opening a new file into a new tab that loses the old tab.
I see the same tab-replacement behavior when opening scad files from the command-line with the ‘open’ command.

  • Revar
I’m on Mac OS Catalina 10.15.7, trying out OpenSCAD snapshot 2020.12.11. I cannot seem to open files into a new tab. My current existing tab always gets replaced by the new file tab. This isn’t making a new window or anything like that. When I do try to open into a new window that works fine. It’s just opening a new file into a new tab that loses the old tab. I see the same tab-replacement behavior when opening scad files from the command-line with the ‘open’ command. - Revar