Empathy List Archives

6

63alfred

Mon, May 16, 2016 7:12 AM

I have an OpenSCAD model that uses some STL imports and the difference
command to create some threads. The model looks fine when compiled in F5
but when I Render using F6 the treaded holes created with the difference
command disappear.I was able to get them originally, but when I added more
elements to the model the will not show up in the F6 Render, almost like
there is not enough memory.There are no errors that come up in the dialog
box and Flushing Caches does not solve the problem.Running Mac OS 10.6.8,
6GB RAM, OpenSCAD version 2013.01
http://forum.openscad.org/file/n17318/panoramaCameraBack_F5.png
http://forum.openscad.org/file/n17318/panoramaCameraBack_F6.png
http://forum.openscad.org/file/n17318/panoramaCameraBack_STL.png

--
View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Compile-F5-image-does-not-match-Render-F6-tp17318.html
Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

I have an OpenSCAD model that uses some STL imports and the difference command to create some threads. The model looks fine when compiled in F5 but when I Render using F6 the treaded holes created with the difference command disappear.I was able to get them originally, but when I added more elements to the model the will not show up in the F6 Render, almost like there is not enough memory.There are no errors that come up in the dialog box and Flushing Caches does not solve the problem.Running Mac OS 10.6.8, 6GB RAM, OpenSCAD version 2013.01 <http://forum.openscad.org/file/n17318/panoramaCameraBack_F5.png> <http://forum.openscad.org/file/n17318/panoramaCameraBack_F6.png> <http://forum.openscad.org/file/n17318/panoramaCameraBack_STL.png> -- View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Compile-F5-image-does-not-match-Render-F6-tp17318.html Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

F

fred_dot_u

Mon, May 16, 2016 9:33 AM

I've had the same thing happen as you show in the images. It's likely the
easy fix is to increase the length of the "differenced" part that creates
the threaded holes by 0.01 in the direction that is showing the half hole in
the image. Sometimes the peculiar behavior is the other way around, in F5 it
appears closed, while F6 will present an open (desired) hole.

--
View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Compile-F5-image-does-not-match-Render-F6-tp17318p17319.html
Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

I've had the same thing happen as you show in the images. It's likely the easy fix is to increase the length of the "differenced" part that creates the threaded holes by 0.01 in the direction that is showing the half hole in the image. Sometimes the peculiar behavior is the other way around, in F5 it appears closed, while F6 will present an open (desired) hole. -- View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Compile-F5-image-does-not-match-Render-F6-tp17318p17319.html Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

M

MichaelAtOz

Mon, May 16, 2016 10:52 AM

There is a strong likelihood that the STL is invalid.
Check it with Netfabb or share it here and I can check it.

Admin - PM me if you need anything, or if I've done something stupid...

Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. Obviously inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above.

The TPP is no simple “trade agreement.” Fight it! http://www.ourfairdeal.org/ time is running out!

View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Compile-F5-image-does-not-match-Render-F6-tp17318p17320.html
Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

There is a strong likelihood that the STL is invalid. Check it with Netfabb or share it here and I can check it. ----- Admin - PM me if you need anything, or if I've done something stupid... Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. Obviously inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above. The TPP is no simple “trade agreement.” Fight it! http://www.ourfairdeal.org/ time is running out! -- View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Compile-F5-image-does-not-match-Render-F6-tp17318p17320.html Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

F

fred_dot_u

Mon, May 16, 2016 12:52 PM

In the image provided, it would likely present a failure, but I'd expect that
once the difference cylinders or shapes are corrected, the whole package
would verify.

--
View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Compile-F5-image-does-not-match-Render-F6-tp17318p17321.html
Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In the image provided, it would likely present a failure, but I'd expect that once the difference cylinders or shapes are corrected, the whole package would verify. -- View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Compile-F5-image-does-not-match-Render-F6-tp17318p17321.html Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

discuss@lists.openscad.org

Compile F5 image does not match Render F6

The TPP is no simple “trade agreement.” Fight it! http://www.ourfairdeal.org/ time is running out!