JL
John Lussmyer
Sat, Apr 4, 2020 3:49 PM
- parallel processing /compilation time in complex models
- descriptve error messages
Yeah, multi-threading would likely speed things up a bunch. On my machine, it can sit for 30 minutes generating the full render - and the CPU never goes over 15%.
--
Bobcats and Cougars, oh my! http://john.casadelgato.com/Pets
On Sat Apr 04 07:16:12 PDT 2020 pproj@posteo.de said:
>1. parallel processing /compilation time in complex models
>2. descriptve error messages
Yeah, multi-threading would likely speed things up a bunch. On my machine, it can sit for 30 minutes generating the full render - and the CPU never goes over 15%.
--
Bobcats and Cougars, oh my! http://john.casadelgato.com/Pets
BW
Benjamin Wand
Sat, Apr 4, 2020 4:45 PM
Am 04.04.2020 um 15:44 schrieb nop head <nop.head@gmail.com mailto:nop.head@gmail.com>:
We already have 2 and 4.
You can do for(x = list).
With right click you can copy from the console.
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 14:32, Benjamin Wand <benjamin.wand@web.de mailto:benjamin.wand@web.de> wrote:
Hi, thanks for asking. This would be my feature-wishlist:
- code completion
- 'for each’ (additionally to for-loops)
- some way to import and/or export data, for instance import a csv file
- that one can copy-paste things from the console
- error messages that are easier to understand
Benjamin
Am 09.11.2019 um 23:22 schrieb Hans L <thehans@gmail.com mailto:thehans@gmail.com>:
Hi everyone,
I wanted to get some input and have a bit of discussion from users
here, regarding what they would most like to see from current or
near-future OpenSCAD development.
What do you feel is the most important aspect to focus on, or would
have the biggest impact to your experience using OpenSCAD:
- Stability, squash more bugs in general
- Optimize existing code, make OpenSCAD faster
- Addition of new features
- More / improved documentation
- All of the above should be balanced equally
- Nothing, I am content
- Something else not mentioned
If you have a specific issue in mind related to your choice, please
describe and link to it if there is an existing github issue.
Disclaimer: I am not a project owner for OpenSCAD, I just contribute
code when / where I can. So this poll is not "official", just created
out of my personal curiosity. There is no guarantee that I or other
volunteer developers will directly address any issues raised here.
Happy modeling,
Hans Loeblich
OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
Mh-mh, ok. If copying would work with the same keyboard shortcut like in every single application on the operating system, that would be a lot more practical though. It is in the menu (like seen on the video), it just doesn’t work through the menu or through the shortcut announced in the menu (cmd + C), which is why I was concluding that it didn’t work at all.
There is a way to ‘right click’ on the mac (also called ’secondary click’). This is what one would get to see:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/rim72aae7pw7p6u/Bildschirmfoto%202020-04-04%20um%2018.37.36.png?dl=0 <https://www.dropbox.com/s/rim72aae7pw7p6u/Bildschirmfoto%202020-04-04%20um%2018.37.36.png?dl=0>
And here is another irritating thing: 'select all works’ with cmd + A but ‘copy' does not work with cmd + C.
> Am 04.04.2020 um 17:10 schrieb nop head <nop.head@gmail.com>:
>
> It is just a right click context menu on Windows. I have never used Apple OS but the last I saw there was only one mouse button, so I have no idea how that works.
>
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 16:06, Benjamin Wand <benjamin.wand@web.de <mailto:benjamin.wand@web.de>> wrote:
> Thanks for the hint how to do ‘for each’, I’m wondering how to present that more prominently on the wikibook.
>
> Here I made a screencast how copying from the console doesn’t work: https://www.dropbox.com/s/jiyeo7l0m3lknwl/still%20not%20copying%20from%20the%20console2020-04-04%2016-41-59.mp4?dl=0 <https://www.dropbox.com/s/jiyeo7l0m3lknwl/still%20not%20copying%20from%20the%20console2020-04-04%2016-41-59.mp4?dl=0>
> Or is it a hidden setting or something?
>
>> Am 04.04.2020 um 15:44 schrieb nop head <nop.head@gmail.com <mailto:nop.head@gmail.com>>:
>>
>> We already have 2 and 4.
>>
>> You can do for(x = list).
>>
>> With right click you can copy from the console.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 14:32, Benjamin Wand <benjamin.wand@web.de <mailto:benjamin.wand@web.de>> wrote:
>> Hi, thanks for asking. This would be my feature-wishlist:
>> 1) code completion
>> 2) 'for each’ (additionally to for-loops)
>> 3) some way to import and/or export data, for instance import a csv file
>> 4) that one can copy-paste things from the console
>> 5) error messages that are easier to understand
>> Benjamin
>>
>> > Am 09.11.2019 um 23:22 schrieb Hans L <thehans@gmail.com <mailto:thehans@gmail.com>>:
>> >
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > I wanted to get some input and have a bit of discussion from users
>> > here, regarding what they would most like to see from current or
>> > near-future OpenSCAD development.
>> >
>> > What do you feel is the most important aspect to focus on, or would
>> > have the biggest impact to your experience using OpenSCAD:
>> >
>> > 1) Stability, squash more bugs in general
>> > 2) Optimize existing code, make OpenSCAD faster
>> > 3) Addition of new features
>> > 4) More / improved documentation
>> > 5) All of the above should be balanced equally
>> > 6) Nothing, I am content
>> > 7) Something else not mentioned
>> >
>> > If you have a specific issue in mind related to your choice, please
>> > describe and link to it if there is an existing github issue.
>> >
>> > Disclaimer: I am not a project owner for OpenSCAD, I just contribute
>> > code when / where I can. So this poll is not "official", just created
>> > out of my personal curiosity. There is no guarantee that I or other
>> > volunteer developers will directly address any issues raised here.
>> >
>> > Happy modeling,
>> > Hans Loeblich
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > OpenSCAD mailing list
>> > Discuss@lists.openscad.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org>
>> > http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org <http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenSCAD mailing list
>> Discuss@lists.openscad.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org>
>> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org <http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenSCAD mailing list
>> Discuss@lists.openscad.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org>
>> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org <http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenSCAD mailing list
> Discuss@lists.openscad.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org>
> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org <http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenSCAD mailing list
> Discuss@lists.openscad.org
> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
NH
nop head
Sat, Apr 4, 2020 4:51 PM
The shortcuts Ctrl-A and Ctrl-C work as well on Windows. OpenSCAD 2019.05.
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 17:46, Benjamin Wand benjamin.wand@web.de wrote:
Mh-mh, ok. If copying would work with the same keyboard shortcut like in
every single application on the operating system, that would be a lot more
practical though. It is in the menu (like seen on the video), it just
doesn’t work through the menu or through the shortcut announced in the menu
(cmd + C), which is why I was concluding that it didn’t work at all.
There is a way to ‘right click’ on the mac (also called ’secondary
click’). This is what one would get to see:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/rim72aae7pw7p6u/Bildschirmfoto%202020-04-04%20um%2018.37.36.png?dl=0
And here is another irritating thing: 'select all works’ with cmd + A but
‘copy' does not work with cmd + C.
Am 04.04.2020 um 17:10 schrieb nop head nop.head@gmail.com:
It is just a right click context menu on Windows. I have never used Apple
OS but the last I saw there was only one mouse button, so I have no idea
how that works.
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 16:06, Benjamin Wand benjamin.wand@web.de wrote:
Hi, thanks for asking. This would be my feature-wishlist:
- code completion
- 'for each’ (additionally to for-loops)
- some way to import and/or export data, for instance import a csv file
- that one can copy-paste things from the console
- error messages that are easier to understand
Benjamin
Am 09.11.2019 um 23:22 schrieb Hans L thehans@gmail.com:
Hi everyone,
I wanted to get some input and have a bit of discussion from users
here, regarding what they would most like to see from current or
near-future OpenSCAD development.
What do you feel is the most important aspect to focus on, or would
have the biggest impact to your experience using OpenSCAD:
- Stability, squash more bugs in general
- Optimize existing code, make OpenSCAD faster
- Addition of new features
- More / improved documentation
- All of the above should be balanced equally
- Nothing, I am content
- Something else not mentioned
If you have a specific issue in mind related to your choice, please
describe and link to it if there is an existing github issue.
Disclaimer: I am not a project owner for OpenSCAD, I just contribute
code when / where I can. So this poll is not "official", just created
out of my personal curiosity. There is no guarantee that I or other
volunteer developers will directly address any issues raised here.
Happy modeling,
Hans Loeblich
OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
The shortcuts Ctrl-A and Ctrl-C work as well on Windows. OpenSCAD 2019.05.
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 17:46, Benjamin Wand <benjamin.wand@web.de> wrote:
> Mh-mh, ok. If copying would work with the same keyboard shortcut like in
> every single application on the operating system, that would be a lot more
> practical though. It is in the menu (like seen on the video), it just
> doesn’t work through the menu or through the shortcut announced in the menu
> (cmd + C), which is why I was concluding that it didn’t work at all.
>
> There is a way to ‘right click’ on the mac (also called ’secondary
> click’). This is what one would get to see:
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/rim72aae7pw7p6u/Bildschirmfoto%202020-04-04%20um%2018.37.36.png?dl=0
>
> And here is another irritating thing: 'select all works’ with cmd + A but
> ‘copy' does not work with cmd + C.
>
>
> Am 04.04.2020 um 17:10 schrieb nop head <nop.head@gmail.com>:
>
> It is just a right click context menu on Windows. I have never used Apple
> OS but the last I saw there was only one mouse button, so I have no idea
> how that works.
>
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 16:06, Benjamin Wand <benjamin.wand@web.de> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the hint how to do ‘for each’, I’m wondering how to present
>> that more prominently on the wikibook.
>>
>> Here I made a screencast how copying from the console doesn’t work:
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/jiyeo7l0m3lknwl/still%20not%20copying%20from%20the%20console2020-04-04%2016-41-59.mp4?dl=0
>> Or is it a hidden setting or something?
>>
>> Am 04.04.2020 um 15:44 schrieb nop head <nop.head@gmail.com>:
>>
>> We already have 2 and 4.
>>
>> You can do for(x = list).
>>
>> With right click you can copy from the console.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 14:32, Benjamin Wand <benjamin.wand@web.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, thanks for asking. This would be my feature-wishlist:
>>> 1) code completion
>>> 2) 'for each’ (additionally to for-loops)
>>> 3) some way to import and/or export data, for instance import a csv file
>>> 4) that one can copy-paste things from the console
>>> 5) error messages that are easier to understand
>>> Benjamin
>>>
>>> > Am 09.11.2019 um 23:22 schrieb Hans L <thehans@gmail.com>:
>>> >
>>> > Hi everyone,
>>> >
>>> > I wanted to get some input and have a bit of discussion from users
>>> > here, regarding what they would most like to see from current or
>>> > near-future OpenSCAD development.
>>> >
>>> > What do you feel is the most important aspect to focus on, or would
>>> > have the biggest impact to your experience using OpenSCAD:
>>> >
>>> > 1) Stability, squash more bugs in general
>>> > 2) Optimize existing code, make OpenSCAD faster
>>> > 3) Addition of new features
>>> > 4) More / improved documentation
>>> > 5) All of the above should be balanced equally
>>> > 6) Nothing, I am content
>>> > 7) Something else not mentioned
>>> >
>>> > If you have a specific issue in mind related to your choice, please
>>> > describe and link to it if there is an existing github issue.
>>> >
>>> > Disclaimer: I am not a project owner for OpenSCAD, I just contribute
>>> > code when / where I can. So this poll is not "official", just created
>>> > out of my personal curiosity. There is no guarantee that I or other
>>> > volunteer developers will directly address any issues raised here.
>>> >
>>> > Happy modeling,
>>> > Hans Loeblich
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > OpenSCAD mailing list
>>> > Discuss@lists.openscad.org
>>> > http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenSCAD mailing list
>>> Discuss@lists.openscad.org
>>> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenSCAD mailing list
>> Discuss@lists.openscad.org
>> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenSCAD mailing list
>> Discuss@lists.openscad.org
>> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenSCAD mailing list
> Discuss@lists.openscad.org
> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenSCAD mailing list
> Discuss@lists.openscad.org
> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
>
LV
Ladislav Vaiz
Sat, Apr 4, 2020 5:02 PM
Would be possible that Ctrl+C without selection copies whole current
line? It is nice idea in Visual Studio, it speeds up line duplication.
L.
Dne 04.04.2020 v 18:51 nop head napsal(a):
The shortcuts Ctrl-A and Ctrl-C work as well on Windows. OpenSCAD 2019.05.
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 17:46, Benjamin Wand <benjamin.wand@web.de
mailto:benjamin.wand@web.de> wrote:
Mh-mh, ok. If copying would work with the same keyboard shortcut
like in every single application on the operating system, that
would be a lot more practical though. It is in the menu (like seen
on the video), it just doesn’t work through the menu or through
the shortcut announced in the menu (cmd + C), which is why I was
concluding that it didn’t work at all.
There is a way to ‘right click’ on the mac (also called ’secondary
click’). This is what one would get to see:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/rim72aae7pw7p6u/Bildschirmfoto%202020-04-04%20um%2018.37.36.png?dl=0
And here is another irritating thing: 'select all works’ with cmd
+ A but ‘copy' does not work with cmd + C.
Am 04.04.2020 um 17:10 schrieb nop head <nop.head@gmail.com
<mailto:nop.head@gmail.com>>:
It is just a right click context menu on Windows. I have never
used Apple OS but the last I saw there was only one mouse button,
so I have no idea how that works.
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 16:06, Benjamin Wand <benjamin.wand@web.de
<mailto:benjamin.wand@web.de>> wrote:
Thanks for the hint how to do ‘for each’, I’m wondering how
to present that more prominently on the wikibook.
Here I made a screencast how copying from the console doesn’t
work:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/jiyeo7l0m3lknwl/still%20not%20copying%20from%20the%20console2020-04-04%2016-41-59.mp4?dl=0
Or is it a hidden setting or something?
Am 04.04.2020 um 15:44 schrieb nop head <nop.head@gmail.com
<mailto:nop.head@gmail.com>>:
We already have 2 and 4.
You can do for(x = list).
With right click you can copy from the console.
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 14:32, Benjamin Wand
<benjamin.wand@web.de <mailto:benjamin.wand@web.de>> wrote:
Hi, thanks for asking. This would be my feature-wishlist:
1) code completion
2) 'for each’ (additionally to for-loops)
3) some way to import and/or export data, for instance
import a csv file
4) that one can copy-paste things from the console
5) error messages that are easier to understand
Benjamin
Am 09.11.2019 um 23:22 schrieb Hans L
<thehans@gmail.com <mailto:thehans@gmail.com>>:
Hi everyone,
I wanted to get some input and have a bit of
here, regarding what they would most like to see from
near-future OpenSCAD development.
What do you feel is the most important aspect to focus
have the biggest impact to your experience using OpenSCAD:
- Stability, squash more bugs in general
- Optimize existing code, make OpenSCAD faster
- Addition of new features
- More / improved documentation
- All of the above should be balanced equally
- Nothing, I am content
- Something else not mentioned
If you have a specific issue in mind related to your
describe and link to it if there is an existing github
Disclaimer: I am not a project owner for OpenSCAD, I
code when / where I can. So this poll is not
out of my personal curiosity. There is no guarantee
volunteer developers will directly address any issues
<mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org>
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
_______________________________________________
OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org
<mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org>
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
_______________________________________________
OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org>
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
_______________________________________________
OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org>
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
_______________________________________________
OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org>
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
Would be possible that Ctrl+C without selection copies whole current
line? It is nice idea in Visual Studio, it speeds up line duplication.
L.
Dne 04.04.2020 v 18:51 nop head napsal(a):
> The shortcuts Ctrl-A and Ctrl-C work as well on Windows. OpenSCAD 2019.05.
>
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 17:46, Benjamin Wand <benjamin.wand@web.de
> <mailto:benjamin.wand@web.de>> wrote:
>
> Mh-mh, ok. If copying would work with the same keyboard shortcut
> like in every single application on the operating system, that
> would be a lot more practical though. It is in the menu (like seen
> on the video), it just doesn’t work through the menu or through
> the shortcut announced in the menu (cmd + C), which is why I was
> concluding that it didn’t work at all.
>
> There is a way to ‘right click’ on the mac (also called ’secondary
> click’). This is what one would get to see:
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/rim72aae7pw7p6u/Bildschirmfoto%202020-04-04%20um%2018.37.36.png?dl=0
>
> And here is another irritating thing: 'select all works’ with cmd
> + A but ‘copy' does not work with cmd + C.
>
>
>> Am 04.04.2020 um 17:10 schrieb nop head <nop.head@gmail.com
>> <mailto:nop.head@gmail.com>>:
>>
>> It is just a right click context menu on Windows. I have never
>> used Apple OS but the last I saw there was only one mouse button,
>> so I have no idea how that works.
>>
>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 16:06, Benjamin Wand <benjamin.wand@web.de
>> <mailto:benjamin.wand@web.de>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the hint how to do ‘for each’, I’m wondering how
>> to present that more prominently on the wikibook.
>>
>> Here I made a screencast how copying from the console doesn’t
>> work:
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/jiyeo7l0m3lknwl/still%20not%20copying%20from%20the%20console2020-04-04%2016-41-59.mp4?dl=0
>> Or is it a hidden setting or something?
>>
>>> Am 04.04.2020 um 15:44 schrieb nop head <nop.head@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:nop.head@gmail.com>>:
>>>
>>> We already have 2 and 4.
>>>
>>> You can do for(x = list).
>>>
>>> With right click you can copy from the console.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 14:32, Benjamin Wand
>>> <benjamin.wand@web.de <mailto:benjamin.wand@web.de>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, thanks for asking. This would be my feature-wishlist:
>>> 1) code completion
>>> 2) 'for each’ (additionally to for-loops)
>>> 3) some way to import and/or export data, for instance
>>> import a csv file
>>> 4) that one can copy-paste things from the console
>>> 5) error messages that are easier to understand
>>> Benjamin
>>>
>>> > Am 09.11.2019 um 23:22 schrieb Hans L
>>> <thehans@gmail.com <mailto:thehans@gmail.com>>:
>>> >
>>> > Hi everyone,
>>> >
>>> > I wanted to get some input and have a bit of
>>> discussion from users
>>> > here, regarding what they would most like to see from
>>> current or
>>> > near-future OpenSCAD development.
>>> >
>>> > What do you feel is the most important aspect to focus
>>> on, or would
>>> > have the biggest impact to your experience using OpenSCAD:
>>> >
>>> > 1) Stability, squash more bugs in general
>>> > 2) Optimize existing code, make OpenSCAD faster
>>> > 3) Addition of new features
>>> > 4) More / improved documentation
>>> > 5) All of the above should be balanced equally
>>> > 6) Nothing, I am content
>>> > 7) Something else not mentioned
>>> >
>>> > If you have a specific issue in mind related to your
>>> choice, please
>>> > describe and link to it if there is an existing github
>>> issue.
>>> >
>>> > Disclaimer: I am not a project owner for OpenSCAD, I
>>> just contribute
>>> > code when / where I can. So this poll is not
>>> "official", just created
>>> > out of my personal curiosity. There is no guarantee
>>> that I or other
>>> > volunteer developers will directly address any issues
>>> raised here.
>>> >
>>> > Happy modeling,
>>> > Hans Loeblich
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > OpenSCAD mailing list
>>> > Discuss@lists.openscad.org
>>> <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org>
>>> >
>>> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenSCAD mailing list
>>> Discuss@lists.openscad.org
>>> <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org>
>>> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenSCAD mailing list
>>> Discuss@lists.openscad.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org>
>>> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenSCAD mailing list
>> Discuss@lists.openscad.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org>
>> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenSCAD mailing list
>> Discuss@lists.openscad.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org>
>> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenSCAD mailing list
> Discuss@lists.openscad.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org>
> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenSCAD mailing list
> Discuss@lists.openscad.org
> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
TP
Torsten Paul
Sat, Apr 4, 2020 5:09 PM
On 04.04.20 19:02, Ladislav Vaiz wrote:
Would be possible that Ctrl+C without selection copies
whole current line? It is nice idea in Visual Studio,
it speeds up line duplication.
Probably not. There's already a line/block duplication
feature (in the dev snapshot) via CTRL-SHIFT + Cursor
Up/Down.
I don't know if/how that works in MacOS though. As that
insists of making things complicated (or maybe it's Qt
doing that) it's difficult to have it covered always.
ciao,
Torsten.
On 04.04.20 19:02, Ladislav Vaiz wrote:
> Would be possible that Ctrl+C without selection copies
> whole current line? It is nice idea in Visual Studio,
> it speeds up line duplication.
Probably not. There's already a line/block duplication
feature (in the dev snapshot) via CTRL-SHIFT + Cursor
Up/Down.
I don't know if/how that works in MacOS though. As that
insists of making things complicated (or maybe it's Qt
doing that) it's difficult to have it covered always.
ciao,
Torsten.
JB
Jordan Brown
Sat, Apr 4, 2020 6:47 PM
Multithreading for full CGAL renders would be nice, but from what the
developers say it isn't possible to do anywhere near as much as you
would like.
One thing that might be practical and would make things nicer would be
to put preview into a separate thread. Currently, if you're doing a
full render it runs in a separate thread. You can continue to edit, in
the same or a different window. If preview takes a long time then the
whole application freezes.
Multithreading for full CGAL renders would be nice, but from what the
developers say it isn't possible to do anywhere near as much as you
would like.
One thing that might be practical and would make things nicer would be
to put preview into a separate thread. Currently, if you're doing a
full render it runs in a separate thread. You can continue to edit, in
the same or a different window. If preview takes a long time then the
whole application freezes.
JC
Juan C.Cilleruelo
Sat, Apr 4, 2020 6:50 PM
I second this request!!!!
On 04/04/2020 20:47, Jordan Brown wrote:
Multithreading for full CGAL renders would be nice, but from what the
developers say it isn't possible to do anywhere near as much as you
would like.
One thing that might be practical and would make things nicer would be
to put preview into a separate thread. Currently, if you're doing a
full render it runs in a separate thread. You can continue to edit,
in the same or a different window. If preview takes a long time then
the whole application freezes.
OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
I second this request!!!!
On 04/04/2020 20:47, Jordan Brown wrote:
> Multithreading for full CGAL renders would be nice, but from what the
> developers say it isn't possible to do anywhere near as much as you
> would like.
>
> One thing that might be practical and would make things nicer would be
> to put preview into a separate thread. Currently, if you're doing a
> full render it runs in a separate thread. You can continue to edit,
> in the same or a different window. If preview takes a long time then
> the whole application freezes.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenSCAD mailing list
> Discuss@lists.openscad.org
> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
P
pproj@posteo.de
Mon, Apr 6, 2020 9:54 AM
I think it would be incredibly useful to be able to click on some point
of the model preview and get a "stack trace" of geometries, modules and
transforms where the part under the cursor was created and transformed.
One way to do it, would be to have a "debug" mode, where every
cylinder,cube,etc created gets an unique color (unique chromacity)
then every transformation adds some unique saturation level (some prime
numbers magic might be needed).
Assuming that rendering only changes the luminosity of part, analyzing
the pixels color value, we could tell what lines of code are responsible
for its creation in which order - a kind of "call stack"
there might be a better way of doing this, this is only an idea, which
seemed doable.
I think it would be incredibly useful to be able to click on some point
of the model preview and get a "stack trace" of geometries, modules and
transforms where the part under the cursor was created and transformed.
One way to do it, would be to have a "debug" mode, where every
cylinder,cube,etc created gets an unique color (unique chromacity)
then every transformation adds some unique saturation level (some prime
numbers magic might be needed).
Assuming that rendering only changes the luminosity of part, analyzing
the pixels color value, we could tell what lines of code are responsible
for its creation in which order - a kind of "call stack"
there might be a better way of doing this, this is only an idea, which
seemed doable.
I use OpenSCAD for Academic purposes. I definitely would find it very
useful if OpenSCAD could compute surface and/or volume.
I think this was mentioned before. Don't remember if there is a hard limit
to get this working, or if it is too much work.
Thanks,
Álvaro Deibe Díaz.
El lun., 6 abr. 2020 a las 11:54, pproj@posteo.de (pproj@posteo.de)
escribió:
I think it would be incredibly useful to be able to click on some point
of the model preview and get a "stack trace" of geometries, modules and
transforms where the part under the cursor was created and transformed.
One way to do it, would be to have a "debug" mode, where every
cylinder,cube,etc created gets an unique color (unique chromacity)
then every transformation adds some unique saturation level (some prime
numbers magic might be needed).
Assuming that rendering only changes the luminosity of part, analyzing
the pixels color value, we could tell what lines of code are responsible
for its creation in which order - a kind of "call stack"
there might be a better way of doing this, this is only an idea, which
seemed doable.
OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
I use OpenSCAD for Academic purposes. I definitely would find it very
useful if OpenSCAD could compute surface and/or volume.
I think this was mentioned before. Don't remember if there is a hard limit
to get this working, or if it is too much work.
Thanks,
Álvaro Deibe Díaz.
El lun., 6 abr. 2020 a las 11:54, pproj@posteo.de (<pproj@posteo.de>)
escribió:
> I think it would be incredibly useful to be able to click on some point
> of the model preview and get a "stack trace" of geometries, modules and
> transforms where the part under the cursor was created and transformed.
>
> One way to do it, would be to have a "debug" mode, where every
> cylinder,cube,etc created gets an unique color (unique chromacity)
>
> then every transformation adds some unique saturation level (some prime
> numbers magic might be needed).
>
> Assuming that rendering only changes the luminosity of part, analyzing
> the pixels color value, we could tell what lines of code are responsible
> for its creation in which order - a kind of "call stack"
>
> there might be a better way of doing this, this is only an idea, which
> seemed doable.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenSCAD mailing list
> Discuss@lists.openscad.org
> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
>