On 13.01.22 19:38, Revar Desmera wrote: > Reading the PR notes, it looks like my answer is yes. Sweet! > This will open up so much user space power. Yes, that's the idea. There's still a couple of questions that need to be answered. Right now, it returns bounding box information plus the points and path / faces. But I'd prefer that it would default to just the data with an optional transformation function. That's all new stuff, so there could be some traps. It's not the full object proposal, but it seems like a way to get this feature into a usable shape while the more general stuff is cooking a totally unclear timeline. ciao, Torsten.