I am unclear why this code results in a pristine cylindrical extrusion
EXCEPT for one small place where it seems to twist frantically...
include <sweep.scad>
function f(a) = [18sin(360a), 18-18cos(360a0.7), 36sin(360*a/2)];
function shape(d) = let (dd = 5 * (1.2 - d/steps))
[for (i=[1:10:360]) [ddsin(i), ddcos(i)]];
step = 0.005;
steps = 1/step;
path = [for (t=[step:step:1-step]) f(t)];
path_transforms = construct_transform_path(path);
sweep(shape(1), path_transforms);
--
Sent from my desktop computer.
I do not receive emails while away from my desk,
nor do I receive texts on my main phone number
(which is a land line).
If you know that I am on the road, please text me.
If you know that I am home, please email me.
@jon The original sweep.scad may show wild twists when the path gets a
vertical (along z) step. This is discussed in
http://forum.openscad.org/Twisty-problem-with-scad-utils-quot-sweep-quot-tc9775.html.
There you will find also change suggestions to overcome that behavior. I
have implemented those suggestions in a fork of sweep.scad and the results
are far better. You may find my fork in
https://github.com/RonaldoCMP/list-comprehension-demos.
2018-01-05 12:55 GMT-02:00 jon jon@jonbondy.com:
I am unclear why this code results in a pristine cylindrical extrusion
EXCEPT for one small place where it seems to twist frantically...
include <sweep.scad>
function f(a) = [18sin(360a), 18-18cos(360a0.7), 36sin(360*a/2)];
function shape(d) = let (dd = 5 * (1.2 - d/steps))
[for (i=[1:10:360]) [ddsin(i), ddcos(i)]];
step = 0.005;
steps = 1/step;
path = [for (t=[step:step:1-step]) f(t)];
path_transforms = construct_transform_path(path);
sweep(shape(1), path_transforms);
--
Sent from my desktop computer.
I do not receive emails while away from my desk,
nor do I receive texts on my main phone number
(which is a land line).
If you know that I am on the road, please text me.
If you know that I am home, please email me.
OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
Thank you for recalling the thread so clearly! Very helpful. I did
notice more than one "sweep.scad" on my computer, but was not able to
recall why I should use one over the other.
Jon
On 1/5/2018 10:05 AM, Ronaldo Persiano wrote:
@jon The original sweep.scad may show wild twists when the path gets a
vertical (along z) step. This is discussed in
http://forum.openscad.org/Twisty-problem-with-scad-utils-quot-sweep-quot-tc9775.html.
There you will find also change suggestions to overcome that behavior.
I have implemented those suggestions in a fork of sweep.scad and the
results are far better. You may find my fork in
https://github.com/RonaldoCMP/list-comprehension-demos.
2018-01-05 12:55 GMT-02:00 jon <jon@jonbondy.com
mailto:jon@jonbondy.com>:
I am unclear why this code results in a pristine cylindrical
extrusion EXCEPT for one small place where it seems to twist
frantically...
include <sweep.scad>
function f(a) = [18*sin(360*a), 18-18*cos(360*a*0.7),
36*sin(360*a/2)];
function shape(d) = let (dd = 5 * (1.2 - d/steps))
[for (i=[1:10:360]) [dd*sin(i), dd*cos(i)]];
step = 0.005;
steps = 1/step;
path = [for (t=[step:step:1-step]) f(t)];
path_transforms = construct_transform_path(path);
sweep(shape(1), path_transforms);
--
Sent from my desktop computer.
I do not receive emails while away from my desk,
nor do I receive texts on my main phone number
(which is a land line).
If you know that I am on the road, please text me.
If you know that I am home, please email me.
_______________________________________________
OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org>
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
<http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org>
OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
--
Sent from my desktop computer.
I do not receive emails while away from my desk,
nor do I receive texts on my main phone number
(which is a land line).
If you know that I am on the road, please text me.
If you know that I am home, please email me.