discuss@lists.openscad.org

OpenSCAD general discussion Mailing-list

View all threads

debug print in openscad functions

NH
nop head
Sat, Jan 16, 2016 8:17 AM

Considering I make heavy used of the separate namespaces for functions,
modules and variables, none of my code will work in OpenScad2 anyway.

On 16 January 2016 at 01:05, Torsten Paul Torsten.Paul@gmx.de wrote:

On 01/16/2016 01:55 AM, MichaelAtOz wrote:

Could consider plain dumb echof() or echo() [as a function] short term

and

immediately deprecate it, while working on debug() [or whatever the grand
OpenSCAD2 solution will be].

Could call it _echo() or something if you don't like funny names...

In case a "temporary" solution is ok, then it can be just echo().
If that's fine with Marius, I'd have an updated pull request ready
based on the older existing echof() pull request...

ciao,
Torsten.


OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org

Considering I make heavy used of the separate namespaces for functions, modules and variables, none of my code will work in OpenScad2 anyway. On 16 January 2016 at 01:05, Torsten Paul <Torsten.Paul@gmx.de> wrote: > On 01/16/2016 01:55 AM, MichaelAtOz wrote: > > Could consider plain dumb echof() or echo() [as a function] short term > and > > immediately deprecate it, while working on debug() [or whatever the grand > > OpenSCAD2 solution will be]. > > > > Could call it _echo() or something if you don't like funny names... > > > In case a "temporary" solution is ok, then it can be just echo(). > If that's fine with Marius, I'd have an updated pull request ready > based on the older existing echof() pull request... > > ciao, > Torsten. > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > Discuss@lists.openscad.org > http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org >