I have a fork of openscad repo ‘cause all the cool kids have one
and i made a branch a bug fix and from that a PR. Now i want to start on a new bug fix
can i just keep using the same branch and making new PRs from it?
OR
is the Better Way to close the branch and make a new one?
My reading about WoW for git shows folks have all kinds of different processes.
What WoW does OpenSCAD (meaning @kintel ) prefer
leave main branch pristine.
one feature / bug fix per branch. can easily be rebased as the main branch
progresses.
On Sat, Sep 20, 2025, 03:21 vulcan_--- via Discuss <
discuss@lists.openscad.org> wrote:
I have a fork of openscad repo ‘cause all the cool kids have one
and i made a branch a bug fix and from that a PR. Now i want to start on a
new bug fix
can i just keep using the same branch and making new PRs from it?
OR
is the Better Way to close the branch and make a new one?
My reading about WoW for git shows folks have all kinds of different
processes.
What WoW does OpenSCAD (meaning @kintel ) prefer
OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org
On 20.09.25 16:38, Jamie Larkby-Lahet via Discuss wrote:
leave main branch pristine.
Yes, quite important as otherwise there will be conflicts when
trying to pull from upstream as soon as other things are merged
there.
one feature / bug fix per branch. can easily be rebased as the main
branch progresses.
Plus if it's a small fix or feature, push that separately and PR
that. The smaller and obvious (either by code or explanation in
the PR description) the PR is the easier it is to review. Things
that can be reviewed quickly might get merged quickly.
If there are open questions, it's possible to still create a PR
but mark it as "Draft" in the github web interface. This way it's
blocked from merging but can still be a good place for discussing
the code.
ciao,
Torsten.