Is there an undocumented parameter to either of these transformation
functions that allows me to retain the aspect ratio of the child node?
Example: if I use surface() to create a texture map from a PNG, is there a
way to resize the output to fit within a specified boundary without
affecting the aspect ratio?
--
View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Retain-aspect-ratio-when-using-scale-or-resize-tp11744.html
Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Is there an undocumented parameter to either of these transformation
functions that allows me to retain the aspect ratio of the child node?
No, but resize() has a documented parameter :-))
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSCAD_User_Manual/Transformations#resize
"If the 'auto' parameter is set to true, it will auto-scale any 0-dimensions to match."
That only catches the case where you know which of the dimension is
the leading one. So what's not working (as far as I know) is to say:
"fit into a cuboid of size xyz and scale such that it maximizes the volume inside"
Scale() can't have a separate parameter as it has factors as values, so
if it should retain aspect ratio, it simply needs the same value.
ciao,
Torsten.
No, says math: either aspect ratio and a 1-dim boundary, or two-dim
boundary.
2015-02-24 15:57 GMT+01:00 QuackingPlums quackingplums@hotmail.com:
Is there an undocumented parameter to either of these transformation
functions that allows me to retain the aspect ratio of the child node?
Example: if I use surface() to create a texture map from a PNG, is there a
way to resize the output to fit within a specified boundary without
affecting the aspect ratio?
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.openscad.org/Retain-aspect-ratio-when-using-scale-or-resize-tp11744.html
Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
--
stempeldergeschichte@googlemail.com karsten@rohrbach.de
P.S. Falls meine E-Mail kürzer ausfällt als Dir angenehm ist:
Ich probiere gerade aus kurze Antworten statt gar keine Antworten zu
schreiben.
Wenn Du gerne mehr lesen möchtest, dann lass es mich bitte wissen.
P.S. In case my e-mail is shorter than you enjoy:
I am currently trying short replies instead of no replies at all.
Please let me know, if you like to read more.
Enjoy!
Thanks for your reply. The auto parameter works as long as the imported PNG
is in a known orientation as you say, but I was hoping I could do something
for a totally generic solution.
Am I correct that there are no functions that can return the dimensions of
an imported PNG file?
--
View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Retain-aspect-ratio-when-using-scale-or-resize-tp11744p11759.html
Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Yes,
for a dxf there is
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSCAD_User_Manual/General#Getting_input
Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the Public Domain; To the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. This work is published globally via the internet. :) Inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above.
View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Retain-aspect-ratio-when-using-scale-or-resize-tp11744p11760.html
Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Feb 25, 2015, at 05:59 AM, QuackingPlums quackingplums@hotmail.com wrote:
Am I correct that there are no functions that can return the dimensions of
an imported PNG file?
It feels like resize() should be extended to have options for specifying a maximum bounding box and preserve aspect ratio.
-Marius
Von: "Marius Kintel" marius@kintel.net
Am I correct that there are no functions that can return the dimensions of
an imported PNG file?
It feels like resize() should be extended to have options for specifying a maximum bounding box and preserve aspect ratio.
And maybe also have some kind of position() thingy too to go along with that? I guess both together should cover most use-cases to fit unknown/extern model parts into some scad design (e.g. STL, DXF, text(), ...).
ciao,
Torsten.