discuss@lists.openscad.org

OpenSCAD general discussion Mailing-list

View all threads

Limits to Polygon ordered pair resolution?

D
donbright
Mon, Aug 7, 2017 12:52 AM

nophead wrote

Not only a bug, it's a bad regression, but still hangs around for more
than 2 years.

Sorry .. i have been away for a while. things got kind of crazy in life and
work. Fortunately I lost my job so that is no longer a problem. Then
fortunately I got a new one so i can keep the internet turned on. I am sorry
to the users, it is not good to disappear as a volunteer like that.
Hopefully things will calm down a bit and i will have enough quiet time to
get something accomplished.


http://github.com/donbright
http://dwitter.net/donbright
http://sozvyezdami.wordpress.com

--
View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Limits-to-Polygon-ordered-pair-resolution-tp20089p22021.html
Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

nophead wrote > Not only a bug, it's a bad regression, but still hangs around for more > than 2 years. Sorry .. i have been away for a while. things got kind of crazy in life and work. Fortunately I lost my job so that is no longer a problem. Then fortunately I got a new one so i can keep the internet turned on. I am sorry to the users, it is not good to disappear as a volunteer like that. Hopefully things will calm down a bit and i will have enough quiet time to get something accomplished. ----- http://github.com/donbright http://dwitter.net/donbright http://sozvyezdami.wordpress.com -- View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Limits-to-Polygon-ordered-pair-resolution-tp20089p22021.html Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
M
MichaelAtOz
Mon, Aug 7, 2017 3:50 AM

Welcome back!
Did you manage a pay rise in the process? Or a stress reduction ;)


Admin - PM me if you need anything, or if I've done something stupid...

Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. Obviously inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above.

The TPP is no simple “trade agreement.”  Fight it! http://www.ourfairdeal.org/  time is running out!

View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Limits-to-Polygon-ordered-pair-resolution-tp20089p22022.html
Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Welcome back! Did you manage a pay rise in the process? Or a stress reduction ;) ----- Admin - PM me if you need anything, or if I've done something stupid... Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. Obviously inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above. The TPP is no simple “trade agreement.” Fight it! http://www.ourfairdeal.org/ time is running out! -- View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Limits-to-Polygon-ordered-pair-resolution-tp20089p22022.html Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
NH
nop head
Mon, Aug 7, 2017 9:13 AM

Hi Don. Good to see you back. No need to apologise.

On 7 August 2017 at 04:50, MichaelAtOz oz.at.michael@gmail.com wrote:

Welcome back!
Did you manage a pay rise in the process? Or a stress reduction ;)


Admin - PM me if you need anything, or if I've done something stupid...

Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the
Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have waived all
copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. Obviously
inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above.

The TPP is no simple “trade agreement.”  Fight it!
http://www.ourfairdeal.org/  time is running out!

View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/
Limits-to-Polygon-ordered-pair-resolution-tp20089p22022.html
Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org

Hi Don. Good to see you back. No need to apologise. On 7 August 2017 at 04:50, MichaelAtOz <oz.at.michael@gmail.com> wrote: > Welcome back! > Did you manage a pay rise in the process? Or a stress reduction ;) > > > > ----- > Admin - PM me if you need anything, or if I've done something stupid... > > Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the > Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have waived all > copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. Obviously > inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above. > > The TPP is no simple “trade agreement.” Fight it! > http://www.ourfairdeal.org/ time is running out! > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/ > Limits-to-Polygon-ordered-pair-resolution-tp20089p22022.html > Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > Discuss@lists.openscad.org > http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org >