discuss@lists.openscad.org

OpenSCAD general discussion Mailing-list

View all threads

latest stable version?

SP
Sanjeev Prabhakar
Mon, Jan 26, 2026 10:22 AM

Hi Nop Head,
Sorry to hear about your health.
I hope things are under control.
Take care
Regards

On Mon, 26 Jan, 2026, 3:14 pm nop head via Discuss, <
discuss@lists.openscad.org> wrote:

One warning is too much because I run with stop on warnings. I am
terminally ill, so I have better things to do than rename all my
vitamins to more ugly names and update all my projects.

On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 at 07:33, Curt McDowell via Discuss <
discuss@lists.openscad.org> wrote:

Chris,

Identifiers that start with digits should definitely be phased out. Only
ancient languages like COBOL, LISP, FORTH and TCL allowed it. LISP has the
same problem as OpenSCAD. It just gets to be too ambiguous:

(setq 6e 1.5)

1.5

(setq 6e2 1.5)

*** - SETQ: 600.0 is not a symbol

Maybe as an interim compromise, only one warning could be printed,
when the first identifier is encountered beginning with a digit, so it
wouldn't be prohibitively annoying.

As a path forward for NopSCADlib, how about using an update script? I'm
attaching a Python script that updates all the subject NopSCADlib
identifiers in all .scad files within a directory, recursively. It could
also be included with the library to allow library users to update their
code with one command. Then you'd be right back onto the latest releases.

-Curt
On 1/23/26 16:13, nop head via Discuss wrote:

Yes but none of my identifiers look like that. They are mostly part
numbers of real objects.

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("6p4mm_disc") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/radials.scad,
line 42

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("10mm_disc") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/radials.scad,
line 43

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("6p4mm_disc") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/radials.scad,
line 45

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("10mm_disc") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/radials.scad,
line 45

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("02531A") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/7_segments.scad,
line 24

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("02352A") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/7_segments.scad,
line 25

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("7_segments") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/7_segments.scad,
line 28

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("02531A") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/7_segments.scad,
line 28

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("02352A") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/7_segments.scad,
line 28

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("9DOF_stick") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/pcbs.scad,
line 1369

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("9DOF_stick") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/pcbs.scad,
line 1405

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("5_160430_7") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/fastons.scad,
line 24

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("5_160430_7") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/fastons.scad,
line 26

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("28BYJ_48") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/geared_steppers.scad,
line 30

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("35BYGHJ75") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/geared_steppers.scad,
line 31

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("28BYJ_48") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/geared_steppers.scad,
line 33

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("35BYGHJ75") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/geared_steppers.scad,
line 33

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("2p54header") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/pin_headers.scad,
line 27

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("2p54joiner") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/pin_headers.scad,
line 28

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("2p54header") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/pin_headers.scad,
line 34

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("80ST_faceplate") will
be removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/servo_motors.scad,
line 20

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("80ST_faceplate") will
be removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/servo_motors.scad,
line 26

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("80ST_faceplate") will
be removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/servo_motors.scad,
line 27

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("80ST_faceplate") will
be removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/servo_motors.scad,
line 28

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("80ST_faceplate") will
be removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/servo_motors.scad,
line 29

On Fri, 23 Jan 2026 at 23:54, Jordan Brown openscad@jordan.maileater.net
wrote:

On 1/23/2026 3:40 PM, nop head wrote:

I haven't got any identifiers that look like hex constants. All
identifiers that start with numbers now warn.

Yes, and warnings are not failures.  Exponential-notation-like words
have never been usable as identifiers.  Hex-constant-like words are no
longer usable.  As I said, we now warn that all such names are on thin
ice.  For instance, it is not implausible that 0oXXXXX and 0bXXXXX might be
used for octal and binary constants.

I also consider it strange and confusing that 1e12 is a number, but
1e12x is an identifier, or that 0xDEUCE is a valid identifier but 0xACE is
not.  Or, for that matter, that 1xACE is a valid identifier but 0xACE is
not.


OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org


OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org

Hi Nop Head, Sorry to hear about your health. I hope things are under control. Take care Regards On Mon, 26 Jan, 2026, 3:14 pm nop head via Discuss, < discuss@lists.openscad.org> wrote: > One warning is too much because I run with stop on warnings. I am > terminally ill, so I have better things to do than rename all my > vitamins to more ugly names and update all my projects. > > On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 at 07:33, Curt McDowell via Discuss < > discuss@lists.openscad.org> wrote: > >> Chris, >> >> Identifiers that start with digits should definitely be phased out. Only >> ancient languages like COBOL, LISP, FORTH and TCL allowed it. LISP has the >> same problem as OpenSCAD. It just gets to be too ambiguous: >> >> > (setq 6e 1.5) >> 1.5 >> > (setq 6e2 1.5) >> *** - SETQ: 600.0 is not a symbol >> >> Maybe as an interim compromise, only *one* warning could be printed, >> when the first identifier is encountered beginning with a digit, so it >> wouldn't be prohibitively annoying. >> >> As a path forward for NopSCADlib, how about using an update script? I'm >> attaching a Python script that updates all the subject NopSCADlib >> identifiers in all .scad files within a directory, recursively. It could >> also be included with the library to allow library users to update their >> code with one command. Then you'd be right back onto the latest releases. >> >> -Curt >> On 1/23/26 16:13, nop head via Discuss wrote: >> >> Yes but none of my identifiers look like that. They are mostly part >> numbers of real objects. >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("6p4mm_disc") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/radials.scad, >> line 42 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("10mm_disc") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/radials.scad, >> line 43 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("6p4mm_disc") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/radials.scad, >> line 45 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("10mm_disc") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/radials.scad, >> line 45 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("02531A") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/7_segments.scad, >> line 24 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("02352A") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/7_segments.scad, >> line 25 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("7_segments") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/7_segments.scad, >> line 28 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("02531A") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/7_segments.scad, >> line 28 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("02352A") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/7_segments.scad, >> line 28 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("9DOF_stick") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/pcbs.scad, >> line 1369 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("9DOF_stick") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/pcbs.scad, >> line 1405 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("5_160430_7") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/fastons.scad, >> line 24 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("5_160430_7") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/fastons.scad, >> line 26 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("28BYJ_48") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/geared_steppers.scad, >> line 30 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("35BYGHJ75") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/geared_steppers.scad, >> line 31 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("28BYJ_48") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/geared_steppers.scad, >> line 33 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("35BYGHJ75") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/geared_steppers.scad, >> line 33 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("2p54header") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/pin_headers.scad, >> line 27 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("2p54joiner") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/pin_headers.scad, >> line 28 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("2p54header") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/pin_headers.scad, >> line 34 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("80ST_faceplate") will >> be removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/servo_motors.scad, >> line 20 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("80ST_faceplate") will >> be removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/servo_motors.scad, >> line 26 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("80ST_faceplate") will >> be removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/servo_motors.scad, >> line 27 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("80ST_faceplate") will >> be removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/servo_motors.scad, >> line 28 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("80ST_faceplate") will >> be removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/servo_motors.scad, >> line 29 >> >> >> On Fri, 23 Jan 2026 at 23:54, Jordan Brown <openscad@jordan.maileater.net> >> wrote: >> >>> On 1/23/2026 3:40 PM, nop head wrote: >>> >>> I haven't got any identifiers that look like hex constants. All >>> identifiers that start with numbers now warn. >>> >>> >>> Yes, and warnings are not failures. Exponential-notation-like words >>> have never been usable as identifiers. Hex-constant-like words are no >>> longer usable. As I said, we now *warn* that all such names are on thin >>> ice. For instance, it is not implausible that 0oXXXXX and 0bXXXXX might be >>> used for octal and binary constants. >>> >>> I also consider it strange and confusing that 1e12 is a number, but >>> 1e12x is an identifier, or that 0xDEUCE is a valid identifier but 0xACE is >>> not. Or, for that matter, that 1xACE is a valid identifier but 0xACE is >>> not. >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenSCAD mailing list >> To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org > > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org
JB
Jordan Brown
Mon, Jan 26, 2026 3:45 PM

On 1/25/2026 11:32 PM, Curt McDowell via Discuss wrote:

Maybe as an interim compromise, only one warning could be printed,
when the first identifier is encountered beginning with a digit, so it
wouldn't be prohibitively annoying.

There is already anti-duplication, but it is on the basis of the message
and the location, so you get one message per name per point where it's
used.  At least you don't get the exact same message multiple times if,
e.g., it's in a loop.

On 1/26/2026 1:43 AM, nop head via Discuss wrote:

One warning is too much because I run with stop on warnings.

Somewhat to my surprise, DEPRECATED messages are not considered warnings
and never cause the program to stop.

On 1/25/2026 11:32 PM, Curt McDowell via Discuss wrote: > > Maybe as an interim compromise, only *one* warning could be printed, > when the first identifier is encountered beginning with a digit, so it > wouldn't be prohibitively annoying. > There is already anti-duplication, but it is on the basis of the message and the location, so you get one message per name per point where it's used.  At least you don't get the exact same message multiple times if, e.g., it's in a loop. On 1/26/2026 1:43 AM, nop head via Discuss wrote: > One warning is too much because I run with stop on warnings. Somewhat to my surprise, DEPRECATED messages are not considered warnings and never cause the program to stop.
NH
nop head
Mon, Jan 26, 2026 4:51 PM

Yes it seems they don't cause a stop. Other weird things are warning in
used modules, which only occur once unless you flush the cache and then
they appear straight away, not on the next F5.

On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 at 15:46, Jordan Brown via Discuss <
discuss@lists.openscad.org> wrote:

On 1/25/2026 11:32 PM, Curt McDowell via Discuss wrote:

Maybe as an interim compromise, only one warning could be printed, when
the first identifier is encountered beginning with a digit, so it wouldn't
be prohibitively annoying.

There is already anti-duplication, but it is on the basis of the message
and the location, so you get one message per name per point where it's
used.  At least you don't get the exact same message multiple times if,
e.g., it's in a loop.

On 1/26/2026 1:43 AM, nop head via Discuss wrote:

One warning is too much because I run with stop on warnings.

Somewhat to my surprise, DEPRECATED messages are not considered warnings
and never cause the program to stop.


OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org

Yes it seems they don't cause a stop. Other weird things are warning in used modules, which only occur once unless you flush the cache and then they appear straight away, not on the next F5. On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 at 15:46, Jordan Brown via Discuss < discuss@lists.openscad.org> wrote: > On 1/25/2026 11:32 PM, Curt McDowell via Discuss wrote: > > Maybe as an interim compromise, only *one* warning could be printed, when > the first identifier is encountered beginning with a digit, so it wouldn't > be prohibitively annoying. > > > There is already anti-duplication, but it is on the basis of the message > and the location, so you get one message per name per point where it's > used. At least you don't get the exact same message multiple times if, > e.g., it's in a loop. > > > On 1/26/2026 1:43 AM, nop head via Discuss wrote: > > One warning is too much because I run with stop on warnings. > > > Somewhat to my surprise, DEPRECATED messages are not considered warnings > and never cause the program to stop. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org
HW
Harvey white
Wed, Jan 28, 2026 5:34 AM

Thank you very very much for that script.  I was trying to do this by
hand, and extract only the parts of the NopSCADlib files that I used. 
Some aspects of the library suit what I do well, and some do not.  I do
this after recovering from updating the older version of OpenSCAD to the
version of this January.  The tactical problem with all the warnings is
simply that they obscure all the real errors and warnings.   For those
new to the current version, clicking on the error in the error list
window will open the subject file, since the console warning is just an
indication of the error, not much more.

The PC board modeling program is back to full operation, as is needed.

Harvey

On 1/26/2026 2:32 AM, Curt McDowell via Discuss wrote:

Chris,

Identifiers that start with digits should definitely be phased out.
Only ancient languages like COBOL, LISP, FORTH and TCL allowed it.
LISP has the same problem as OpenSCAD. It just gets to be too ambiguous:

(setq 6e 1.5)

 1.5

(setq 6e2 1.5)

 *** - SETQ: 600.0 is not a symbol

Maybe as an interim compromise, only one warning could be printed,
when the first identifier is encountered beginning with a digit, so it
wouldn't be prohibitively annoying.

As a path forward for NopSCADlib, how about using an update script?
I'm attaching a Python script that updates all the subject NopSCADlib
identifiers in all .scad files within a directory, recursively. It
could also be included with the library to allow library users to
update their code with one command. Then you'd be right back onto the
latest releases.

-Curt

On 1/23/26 16:13, nop head via Discuss wrote:

Yes but none of my identifiers look like that. They are mostly part
numbers of real objects.

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("6p4mm_disc") will
be removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/radials.scad,
line 42

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("10mm_disc") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/radials.scad,
line 43

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("6p4mm_disc") will
be removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/radials.scad,
line 45

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("10mm_disc") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/radials.scad,
line 45

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("02531A") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/7_segments.scad,
line 24

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("02352A") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/7_segments.scad,
line 25

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("7_segments") will
be removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/7_segments.scad,
line 28

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("02531A") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/7_segments.scad,
line 28

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("02352A") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/7_segments.scad,
line 28

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("9DOF_stick") will
be removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/pcbs.scad,
line 1369

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("9DOF_stick") will
be removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/pcbs.scad,
line 1405

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("5_160430_7") will
be removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/fastons.scad,
line 24

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("5_160430_7") will
be removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/fastons.scad,
line 26

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("28BYJ_48") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/geared_steppers.scad,
line 30

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("35BYGHJ75") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/geared_steppers.scad,
line 31

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("28BYJ_48") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/geared_steppers.scad,
line 33

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("35BYGHJ75") will be
removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/geared_steppers.scad,
line 33

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("2p54header") will
be removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/pin_headers.scad,
line 27

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("2p54joiner") will
be removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/pin_headers.scad,
line 28

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("2p54header") will
be removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/pin_headers.scad,
line 34

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("80ST_faceplate")
will be removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/servo_motors.scad,
line 20

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("80ST_faceplate")
will be removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/servo_motors.scad,
line 26

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("80ST_faceplate")
will be removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/servo_motors.scad,
line 27

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("80ST_faceplate")
will be removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/servo_motors.scad,
line 28

DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("80ST_faceplate")
will be removed in future releases. in file
../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/servo_motors.scad,
line 29

On Fri, 23 Jan 2026 at 23:54, Jordan Brown
openscad@jordan.maileater.net wrote:

 On 1/23/2026 3:40 PM, nop head wrote:
 I haven't got any identifiers that look like hex constants. All
 identifiers that start with numbers now warn.
 Yes, and warnings are not failures. Exponential-notation-like
 words have never been usable as identifiers.  Hex-constant-like
 words are no longer usable.  As I said, we now *warn* that all
 such names are on thin ice.  For instance, it is not implausible
 that 0oXXXXX and 0bXXXXX might be used for octal and binary
 constants.

 I also consider it strange and confusing that 1e12 is a number,
 but 1e12x is an identifier, or that 0xDEUCE is a valid identifier
 but 0xACE is not.  Or, for that matter, that 1xACE is a valid
 identifier but 0xACE is not.

OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org

Thank you very very much for that script.  I was trying to do this by hand, and extract only the parts of the NopSCADlib files that I used.  Some aspects of the library suit what I do well, and some do not.  I do this after recovering from updating the older version of OpenSCAD to the version of this January.  The tactical problem with all the warnings is simply that they obscure all the real errors and warnings.   For those new to the current version, clicking on the error in the error list window will open the subject file, since the console warning is just an indication of the error, not much more. The PC board modeling program is back to full operation, as is needed. Harvey On 1/26/2026 2:32 AM, Curt McDowell via Discuss wrote: > > Chris, > > Identifiers that start with digits should definitely be phased out. > Only ancient languages like COBOL, LISP, FORTH and TCL allowed it. > LISP has the same problem as OpenSCAD. It just gets to be too ambiguous: > > > (setq 6e 1.5) > 1.5 > > (setq 6e2 1.5) > *** - SETQ: 600.0 is not a symbol > > Maybe as an interim compromise, only *one* warning could be printed, > when the first identifier is encountered beginning with a digit, so it > wouldn't be prohibitively annoying. > > As a path forward for NopSCADlib, how about using an update script? > I'm attaching a Python script that updates all the subject NopSCADlib > identifiers in all .scad files within a directory, recursively. It > could also be included with the library to allow library users to > update their code with one command. Then you'd be right back onto the > latest releases. > > -Curt > > On 1/23/26 16:13, nop head via Discuss wrote: >> Yes but none of my identifiers look like that. They are mostly part >> numbers of real objects. >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("6p4mm_disc") will >> be removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/radials.scad, >> line 42 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("10mm_disc") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/radials.scad, >> line 43 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("6p4mm_disc") will >> be removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/radials.scad, >> line 45 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("10mm_disc") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/radials.scad, >> line 45 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("02531A") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/7_segments.scad, >> line 24 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("02352A") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/7_segments.scad, >> line 25 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("7_segments") will >> be removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/7_segments.scad, >> line 28 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("02531A") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/7_segments.scad, >> line 28 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("02352A") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/7_segments.scad, >> line 28 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("9DOF_stick") will >> be removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/pcbs.scad, >> line 1369 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("9DOF_stick") will >> be removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/pcbs.scad, >> line 1405 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("5_160430_7") will >> be removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/fastons.scad, >> line 24 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("5_160430_7") will >> be removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/fastons.scad, >> line 26 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("28BYJ_48") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/geared_steppers.scad, >> line 30 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("35BYGHJ75") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/geared_steppers.scad, >> line 31 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("28BYJ_48") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/geared_steppers.scad, >> line 33 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("35BYGHJ75") will be >> removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/geared_steppers.scad, >> line 33 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("2p54header") will >> be removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/pin_headers.scad, >> line 27 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("2p54joiner") will >> be removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/pin_headers.scad, >> line 28 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("2p54header") will >> be removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/pin_headers.scad, >> line 34 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("80ST_faceplate") >> will be removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/servo_motors.scad, >> line 20 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("80ST_faceplate") >> will be removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/servo_motors.scad, >> line 26 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("80ST_faceplate") >> will be removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/servo_motors.scad, >> line 27 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("80ST_faceplate") >> will be removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/servo_motors.scad, >> line 28 >> >> DEPRECATED: Variable names starting with digits ("80ST_faceplate") >> will be removed in future releases. in file >> ../../../Nextcloud/CHRIS/Projects/RepRaptor/OpenSCADLibs/NopSCADlib/vitamins/servo_motors.scad, >> line 29 >> >> >> >> On Fri, 23 Jan 2026 at 23:54, Jordan Brown >> <openscad@jordan.maileater.net> wrote: >> >> On 1/23/2026 3:40 PM, nop head wrote: >>> I haven't got any identifiers that look like hex constants. All >>> identifiers that start with numbers now warn. >> >> Yes, and warnings are not failures. Exponential-notation-like >> words have never been usable as identifiers.  Hex-constant-like >> words are no longer usable.  As I said, we now *warn* that all >> such names are on thin ice.  For instance, it is not implausible >> that 0oXXXXX and 0bXXXXX might be used for octal and binary >> constants. >> >> I also consider it strange and confusing that 1e12 is a number, >> but 1e12x is an identifier, or that 0xDEUCE is a valid identifier >> but 0xACE is not.  Or, for that matter, that 1xACE is a valid >> identifier but 0xACE is not. >> > > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org
JB
Jordan Brown
Wed, Jan 28, 2026 6:07 AM

On 1/27/2026 9:34 PM, Harvey white via Discuss wrote:

The tactical problem with all the warnings is simply that they obscure
all the real errors and warnings.

Yes.  We have this problem at work.  We have about 8M+ lines of C code
that we require ourselves to keep to zero warnings.  Every time we get a
new version of the compiler or of our checking tools, we have hundreds
of new warnings to analyze and address.  The win is that typically a
small percentage of them represent previously-unknown bugs.

That doesn't directly apply here, because here there's little chance
that one of the troublesome constructs will ever cause a subtle
failure.  Either they'll be OK, or they'll fail catastrophically.  The
win is in ensuring that they will not fail catastrophically in the future.

On 1/27/2026 9:34 PM, Harvey white via Discuss wrote: > The tactical problem with all the warnings is simply that they obscure > all the real errors and warnings. Yes.  We have this problem at work.  We have about 8M+ lines of C code that we require ourselves to keep to zero warnings.  Every time we get a new version of the compiler or of our checking tools, we have hundreds of new warnings to analyze and address.  The win is that typically a small percentage of them represent previously-unknown bugs. That doesn't directly apply here, because here there's little chance that one of the troublesome constructs will ever cause a subtle failure.  Either they'll be OK, or they'll fail catastrophically.  The win is in ensuring that they will not fail catastrophically in the future.
BC
Bob Carlson
Wed, Jan 28, 2026 4:26 PM

I don’t use NOP Heads library but it obviously represents a LOT of value. Why not add an option that disables this specific warning? I agree that number leading variable names should go, but this seems like a pragmatic solution that would be quick to implement..

-Bob

On Jan 27, 2026, at 23:07, Jordan Brown via Discuss discuss@lists.openscad.org wrote:

On 1/27/2026 9:34 PM, Harvey white via Discuss wrote:

The tactical problem with all the warnings is simply that they obscure all the real errors and warnings.

Yes.  We have this problem at work.  We have about 8M+ lines of C code that we require ourselves to keep to zero warnings.  Every time we get a new version of the compiler or of our checking tools, we have hundreds of new warnings to analyze and address.  The win is that typically a small percentage of them represent previously-unknown bugs.

That doesn't directly apply here, because here there's little chance that one of the troublesome constructs will ever cause a subtle failure.  Either they'll be OK, or they'll fail catastrophically.  The win is in ensuring that they will not fail catastrophically in the future.


OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org

I don’t use NOP Heads library but it obviously represents a LOT of value. Why not add an option that disables this specific warning? I agree that number leading variable names should go, but this seems like a pragmatic solution that would be quick to implement.. -Bob > On Jan 27, 2026, at 23:07, Jordan Brown via Discuss <discuss@lists.openscad.org> wrote: > > On 1/27/2026 9:34 PM, Harvey white via Discuss wrote: >> The tactical problem with all the warnings is simply that they obscure all the real errors and warnings. > > Yes. We have this problem at work. We have about 8M+ lines of C code that we require ourselves to keep to zero warnings. Every time we get a new version of the compiler or of our checking tools, we have hundreds of new warnings to analyze and address. The win is that typically a small percentage of them represent previously-unknown bugs. > > That doesn't directly apply here, because here there's little chance that one of the troublesome constructs will ever cause a subtle failure. Either they'll be OK, or they'll fail catastrophically. The win is in ensuring that they will not fail catastrophically in the future. > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org
AM
Adrian Mariano
Wed, Jan 28, 2026 5:08 PM

Because the point of the warning is to warn you that identifiers starting
with numbers are being phased out. So eventually they so be errors rather
than warnings.  It defeats the purpose of the warning to let people turn it
off. Then when the full ban takes effect all the code becomes unusable
rather than just a source of annoying warnings.

It sounds to me like if nopscadlib is important to the community we need
someone to take over maintenance and development of the library.

On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 11:27 Bob Carlson via Discuss <
discuss@lists.openscad.org> wrote:

I don’t use NOP Heads library but it obviously represents a LOT of value.
Why not add an option that disables this specific warning? I agree that
number leading variable names should go, but this seems like a pragmatic
solution that would be quick to implement..

-Bob

On Jan 27, 2026, at 23:07, Jordan Brown via Discuss <

On 1/27/2026 9:34 PM, Harvey white via Discuss wrote:

The tactical problem with all the warnings is simply that they obscure

all the real errors and warnings.

Yes.  We have this problem at work.  We have about 8M+ lines of C code

that we require ourselves to keep to zero warnings.  Every time we get a
new version of the compiler or of our checking tools, we have hundreds of
new warnings to analyze and address.  The win is that typically a small
percentage of them represent previously-unknown bugs.

That doesn't directly apply here, because here there's little chance

that one of the troublesome constructs will ever cause a subtle failure.
Either they'll be OK, or they'll fail catastrophically.  The win is in
ensuring that they will not fail catastrophically in the future.


OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org


OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org

Because the point of the warning is to warn you that identifiers starting with numbers are being phased out. So eventually they so be errors rather than warnings. It defeats the purpose of the warning to let people turn it off. Then when the full ban takes effect all the code becomes unusable rather than just a source of annoying warnings. It sounds to me like if nopscadlib is important to the community we need someone to take over maintenance and development of the library. On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 11:27 Bob Carlson via Discuss < discuss@lists.openscad.org> wrote: > I don’t use NOP Heads library but it obviously represents a LOT of value. > Why not add an option that disables this specific warning? I agree that > number leading variable names should go, but this seems like a pragmatic > solution that would be quick to implement.. > > -Bob > > > On Jan 27, 2026, at 23:07, Jordan Brown via Discuss < > discuss@lists.openscad.org> wrote: > > > > On 1/27/2026 9:34 PM, Harvey white via Discuss wrote: > >> The tactical problem with all the warnings is simply that they obscure > all the real errors and warnings. > > > > Yes. We have this problem at work. We have about 8M+ lines of C code > that we require ourselves to keep to zero warnings. Every time we get a > new version of the compiler or of our checking tools, we have hundreds of > new warnings to analyze and address. The win is that typically a small > percentage of them represent previously-unknown bugs. > > > > That doesn't directly apply here, because here there's little chance > that one of the troublesome constructs will ever cause a subtle failure. > Either they'll be OK, or they'll fail catastrophically. The win is in > ensuring that they will not fail catastrophically in the future. > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenSCAD mailing list > > To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org
NH
nop head
Wed, Jan 28, 2026 5:22 PM

The change to $variables long ago breaks NopSCADlib so I use a version just
after the last release.

On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 at 17:08, Adrian Mariano via Discuss <
discuss@lists.openscad.org> wrote:

Because the point of the warning is to warn you that identifiers starting
with numbers are being phased out. So eventually they so be errors rather
than warnings.  It defeats the purpose of the warning to let people turn it
off. Then when the full ban takes effect all the code becomes unusable
rather than just a source of annoying warnings.

It sounds to me like if nopscadlib is important to the community we need
someone to take over maintenance and development of the library.

On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 11:27 Bob Carlson via Discuss <
discuss@lists.openscad.org> wrote:

I don’t use NOP Heads library but it obviously represents a LOT of value.
Why not add an option that disables this specific warning? I agree that
number leading variable names should go, but this seems like a pragmatic
solution that would be quick to implement..

-Bob

On Jan 27, 2026, at 23:07, Jordan Brown via Discuss <

On 1/27/2026 9:34 PM, Harvey white via Discuss wrote:

The tactical problem with all the warnings is simply that they obscure

all the real errors and warnings.

Yes.  We have this problem at work.  We have about 8M+ lines of C code

that we require ourselves to keep to zero warnings.  Every time we get a
new version of the compiler or of our checking tools, we have hundreds of
new warnings to analyze and address.  The win is that typically a small
percentage of them represent previously-unknown bugs.

That doesn't directly apply here, because here there's little chance

that one of the troublesome constructs will ever cause a subtle failure.
Either they'll be OK, or they'll fail catastrophically.  The win is in
ensuring that they will not fail catastrophically in the future.


OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org


OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org


OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org

The change to $variables long ago breaks NopSCADlib so I use a version just after the last release. On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 at 17:08, Adrian Mariano via Discuss < discuss@lists.openscad.org> wrote: > Because the point of the warning is to warn you that identifiers starting > with numbers are being phased out. So eventually they so be errors rather > than warnings. It defeats the purpose of the warning to let people turn it > off. Then when the full ban takes effect all the code becomes unusable > rather than just a source of annoying warnings. > > It sounds to me like if nopscadlib is important to the community we need > someone to take over maintenance and development of the library. > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 11:27 Bob Carlson via Discuss < > discuss@lists.openscad.org> wrote: > >> I don’t use NOP Heads library but it obviously represents a LOT of value. >> Why not add an option that disables this specific warning? I agree that >> number leading variable names should go, but this seems like a pragmatic >> solution that would be quick to implement.. >> >> -Bob >> >> > On Jan 27, 2026, at 23:07, Jordan Brown via Discuss < >> discuss@lists.openscad.org> wrote: >> > >> > On 1/27/2026 9:34 PM, Harvey white via Discuss wrote: >> >> The tactical problem with all the warnings is simply that they obscure >> all the real errors and warnings. >> > >> > Yes. We have this problem at work. We have about 8M+ lines of C code >> that we require ourselves to keep to zero warnings. Every time we get a >> new version of the compiler or of our checking tools, we have hundreds of >> new warnings to analyze and address. The win is that typically a small >> percentage of them represent previously-unknown bugs. >> > >> > That doesn't directly apply here, because here there's little chance >> that one of the troublesome constructs will ever cause a subtle failure. >> Either they'll be OK, or they'll fail catastrophically. The win is in >> ensuring that they will not fail catastrophically in the future. >> > _______________________________________________ >> > OpenSCAD mailing list >> > To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenSCAD mailing list >> To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org > > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org
JB
Jon Bondy
Wed, Jan 28, 2026 6:35 PM

I wonder if one of you who is currently playing with AI could ask it to
fix nop head's library.  It would be an interesting exercise, even if it
fails.  I'm not sure how or whether the $variable problems could also be
fixed using AI.

:)

On 1/28/2026 12:08 PM, Adrian Mariano via Discuss wrote:

Because the point of the warning is to warn you that identifiers
starting with numbers are being phased out. So eventually they so be
errors rather than warnings.  It defeats the purpose of the warning to
let people turn it off. Then when the full ban takes effect all the
code becomes unusable rather than just a source of annoying warnings.

It sounds to me like if nopscadlib is important to the community we
need someone to take over maintenance and development of the library.

On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 11:27 Bob Carlson via Discuss
discuss@lists.openscad.org wrote:

 I don’t use NOP Heads library but it obviously represents a LOT of
 value. Why not add an option that disables this specific warning?
 I agree that number leading variable names should go, but this
 seems like a pragmatic solution that would be quick to implement..

 -Bob

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com

I wonder if one of you who is currently playing with AI could ask it to fix nop head's library.  It would be an interesting exercise, even if it fails.  I'm not sure how or whether the $variable problems could also be fixed using AI. :) On 1/28/2026 12:08 PM, Adrian Mariano via Discuss wrote: > Because the point of the warning is to warn you that identifiers > starting with numbers are being phased out. So eventually they so be > errors rather than warnings.  It defeats the purpose of the warning to > let people turn it off. Then when the full ban takes effect all the > code becomes unusable rather than just a source of annoying warnings. > > It sounds to me like if nopscadlib is important to the community we > need someone to take over maintenance and development of the library. > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 11:27 Bob Carlson via Discuss > <discuss@lists.openscad.org> wrote: > > I don’t use NOP Heads library but it obviously represents a LOT of > value. Why not add an option that disables this specific warning? > I agree that number leading variable names should go, but this > seems like a pragmatic solution that would be quick to implement.. > > -Bob > > -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com