Thanks a lot Thorsten! as always hepful. On 21.09.23 21:23, Torsten Paul wrote: > Disclaimer first... no legal advice... > > On 20.09.23 00:44, pproj@posteo.de wrote: > >> if it can be dual licensed under OHL-S (v2). It is now under GPL2 (just >> because i have known it and its principles for very many years) > > I'm pretty sure you can license your works as you like under as many > licenses as you wish. > > If OHL-S works for source code, I don't know. I'm not even sure it's > really clear how licenses work in this context. Specifically if the > resulting object, or even the STL is somehow related license wise. > > >> So how to license it, so it will stay compatible with Openscad's >> licensing and enable most people to use it? > > My expectation here is that there is no relation to the OpenSCAD > application license. The OpenSCAD source code is GPL-2+ (mostly, > with some MIT bits), the binaries we ship (due to CGAL) are GPL-3+. > > I don't know if we should add an explicit disclaimer, but I don't > see any reason why the application license should in any way infect > the data it's processing. > > ciao, >   Torsten. > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org