discuss@lists.openscad.org

OpenSCAD general discussion Mailing-list

View all threads

Strange problem with verticality

GF
Greg Frost
Mon, Jul 25, 2016 10:05 PM

Slipping pulley.

Sent from my iPhone

On 26 Jul 2016, at 7:31 AM, Ronaldo Persiano rcmpersiano@gmail.com wrote:

How exactly are your prints not vertical? Are they slanted, growing bigger at each layer? Or what?

2016-07-25 18:35 GMT-03:00 jon jon@jonbondy.com:

Thanks for the thought, but in fact the remainder of the print is pristine, so that is not the problem.

On 7/25/2016 5:30 PM, MichaelAtOz wrote:
Then your steppers are losing steps/skipping
http://machinedesign.com/motorsdrives/why-open-loop-steppers-lose-steps-and-how-solve-problem
?


Admin - PM me if you need anything, or if I've done something stupid...

Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. Obviously inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above.

The TPP is no simple “trade agreement.”  Fight it! http://www.ourfairdeal.org/  time is running out!

View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Strange-problem-with-verticality-tp17969p17976.html
Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7690 / Virus Database: 4627/12682 - Release Date: 07/25/16

Slipping pulley. Sent from my iPhone > On 26 Jul 2016, at 7:31 AM, Ronaldo Persiano <rcmpersiano@gmail.com> wrote: > > How exactly are your prints not vertical? Are they slanted, growing bigger at each layer? Or what? > > 2016-07-25 18:35 GMT-03:00 jon <jon@jonbondy.com>: >> Thanks for the thought, but in fact the remainder of the print is pristine, so that is not the problem. >> >> >> >>> On 7/25/2016 5:30 PM, MichaelAtOz wrote: >>> Then your steppers are losing steps/skipping >>> <http://machinedesign.com/motorsdrives/why-open-loop-steppers-lose-steps-and-how-solve-problem> >>> ? >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Admin - PM me if you need anything, or if I've done something stupid... >>> >>> Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. Obviously inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above. >>> >>> The TPP is no simple “trade agreement.” Fight it! http://www.ourfairdeal.org/ time is running out! >>> -- >>> View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Strange-problem-with-verticality-tp17969p17976.html >>> Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenSCAD mailing list >>> Discuss@lists.openscad.org >>> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> No virus found in this message. >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>> Version: 2016.0.7690 / Virus Database: 4627/12682 - Release Date: 07/25/16 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenSCAD mailing list >> Discuss@lists.openscad.org >> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org > > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > Discuss@lists.openscad.org > http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
J
jon
Mon, Jul 25, 2016 10:25 PM

One small portion of the print has a vertical surface that is at a
slight angle.  The result is that a part that is supposed to mate with
it fails to mate.  The rest of the print is pristine.

Jon

On 7/25/2016 6:01 PM, Ronaldo Persiano wrote:

How exactly are your prints not vertical? Are they slanted, growing
bigger at each layer? Or what?

2016-07-25 18:35 GMT-03:00 jon <jon@jonbondy.com
mailto:jon@jonbondy.com>:

 Thanks for the thought, but in fact the remainder of the print is
 pristine, so that is not the problem.



 On 7/25/2016 5:30 PM, MichaelAtOz wrote:

     Then your steppers are losing steps/skipping
     <http://machinedesign.com/motorsdrives/why-open-loop-steppers-lose-steps-and-how-solve-problem>
     ?



     -----
     Admin - PM me if you need anything, or if I've done something
     stupid...

     Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is
     in the Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have
     waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to
     this work. Obviously inclusion of works of previous authors is
     not included in the above.

     The TPP is no simple “trade agreement.”   Fight it!
     http://www.ourfairdeal.org/  time is running out!
     --
     View this message in context:
     http://forum.openscad.org/Strange-problem-with-verticality-tp17969p17976.html
     Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

     _______________________________________________
     OpenSCAD mailing list
     Discuss@lists.openscad.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org>
     http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org


     -----
     No virus found in this message.
     Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
     Version: 2016.0.7690 / Virus Database: 4627/12682 - Release
     Date: 07/25/16



 _______________________________________________
 OpenSCAD mailing list
 Discuss@lists.openscad.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org>
 http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org

OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7690 / Virus Database: 4627/12682 - Release Date: 07/25/16

One small portion of the print has a vertical surface that is at a slight angle. The result is that a part that is supposed to mate with it fails to mate. The rest of the print is pristine. Jon On 7/25/2016 6:01 PM, Ronaldo Persiano wrote: > How exactly are your prints not vertical? Are they slanted, growing > bigger at each layer? Or what? > > 2016-07-25 18:35 GMT-03:00 jon <jon@jonbondy.com > <mailto:jon@jonbondy.com>>: > > Thanks for the thought, but in fact the remainder of the print is > pristine, so that is not the problem. > > > > On 7/25/2016 5:30 PM, MichaelAtOz wrote: > > Then your steppers are losing steps/skipping > <http://machinedesign.com/motorsdrives/why-open-loop-steppers-lose-steps-and-how-solve-problem> > ? > > > > ----- > Admin - PM me if you need anything, or if I've done something > stupid... > > Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is > in the Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have > waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to > this work. Obviously inclusion of works of previous authors is > not included in the above. > > The TPP is no simple “trade agreement.” Fight it! > http://www.ourfairdeal.org/ time is running out! > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.openscad.org/Strange-problem-with-verticality-tp17969p17976.html > Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > Discuss@lists.openscad.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org> > http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> > Version: 2016.0.7690 / Virus Database: 4627/12682 - Release > Date: 07/25/16 > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > Discuss@lists.openscad.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org> > http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > Discuss@lists.openscad.org > http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org > > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> > Version: 2016.0.7690 / Virus Database: 4627/12682 - Release Date: 07/25/16 >
J
jon
Mon, Jul 25, 2016 10:25 PM

No pulleys.  Lead screws.  But thanks for the thought.

On 7/25/2016 6:05 PM, Greg Frost wrote:

Slipping pulley.

Sent from my iPhone

On 26 Jul 2016, at 7:31 AM, Ronaldo Persiano <rcmpersiano@gmail.com
mailto:rcmpersiano@gmail.com> wrote:

How exactly are your prints not vertical? Are they slanted, growing
bigger at each layer? Or what?

2016-07-25 18:35 GMT-03:00 jon <jon@jonbondy.com
mailto:jon@jonbondy.com>:

 Thanks for the thought, but in fact the remainder of the print is
 pristine, so that is not the problem.



 On 7/25/2016 5:30 PM, MichaelAtOz wrote:

     Then your steppers are losing steps/skipping
     <http://machinedesign.com/motorsdrives/why-open-loop-steppers-lose-steps-and-how-solve-problem>
     ?



     -----
     Admin - PM me if you need anything, or if I've done something
     stupid...

     Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is
     in the Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I
     have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights
     to this work. Obviously inclusion of works of previous
     authors is not included in the above.

     The TPP is no simple “trade agreement.”   Fight it!
     http://www.ourfairdeal.org/  time is running out!
     --
     View this message in context:
     http://forum.openscad.org/Strange-problem-with-verticality-tp17969p17976.html
     Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com
     <http://nabble.com>.

     _______________________________________________
     OpenSCAD mailing list
     Discuss@lists.openscad.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org>
     http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org


     -----
     No virus found in this message.
     Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
     Version: 2016.0.7690 / Virus Database: 4627/12682 - Release
     Date: 07/25/16



 _______________________________________________
 OpenSCAD mailing list
 Discuss@lists.openscad.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org>
 http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org

OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org


OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7690 / Virus Database: 4627/12682 - Release Date: 07/25/16

No pulleys. Lead screws. But thanks for the thought. On 7/25/2016 6:05 PM, Greg Frost wrote: > Slipping pulley. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 26 Jul 2016, at 7:31 AM, Ronaldo Persiano <rcmpersiano@gmail.com > <mailto:rcmpersiano@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> How exactly are your prints not vertical? Are they slanted, growing >> bigger at each layer? Or what? >> >> 2016-07-25 18:35 GMT-03:00 jon <jon@jonbondy.com >> <mailto:jon@jonbondy.com>>: >> >> Thanks for the thought, but in fact the remainder of the print is >> pristine, so that is not the problem. >> >> >> >> On 7/25/2016 5:30 PM, MichaelAtOz wrote: >> >> Then your steppers are losing steps/skipping >> <http://machinedesign.com/motorsdrives/why-open-loop-steppers-lose-steps-and-how-solve-problem> >> ? >> >> >> >> ----- >> Admin - PM me if you need anything, or if I've done something >> stupid... >> >> Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is >> in the Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I >> have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights >> to this work. Obviously inclusion of works of previous >> authors is not included in the above. >> >> The TPP is no simple “trade agreement.” Fight it! >> http://www.ourfairdeal.org/ time is running out! >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://forum.openscad.org/Strange-problem-with-verticality-tp17969p17976.html >> Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com >> <http://nabble.com>. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenSCAD mailing list >> Discuss@lists.openscad.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org> >> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org >> >> >> ----- >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> >> Version: 2016.0.7690 / Virus Database: 4627/12682 - Release >> Date: 07/25/16 >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenSCAD mailing list >> Discuss@lists.openscad.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org> >> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenSCAD mailing list >> Discuss@lists.openscad.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.openscad.org> >> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > Discuss@lists.openscad.org > http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org > > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> > Version: 2016.0.7690 / Virus Database: 4627/12682 - Release Date: 07/25/16 >
RP
Ronaldo Persiano
Mon, Jul 25, 2016 11:00 PM

I checked the stl file again with Repetier and there is no flaws like you
mentioned. I would suggest you to print it again in another table position.

2016-07-25 19:25 GMT-03:00 jon jon@jonbondy.com:

No pulleys.  Lead screws.  But thanks for the thought.

On 7/25/2016 6:05 PM, Greg Frost wrote:

Slipping pulley.

Sent from my iPhone

On 26 Jul 2016, at 7:31 AM, Ronaldo Persiano rcmpersiano@gmail.com
wrote:

How exactly are your prints not vertical? Are they slanted, growing bigger
at each layer? Or what?

2016-07-25 18:35 GMT-03:00 jon jon@jonbondy.com:

Thanks for the thought, but in fact the remainder of the print is
pristine, so that is not the problem.

On 7/25/2016 5:30 PM, MichaelAtOz wrote:

?


Admin - PM me if you need anything, or if I've done something stupid...

Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the
Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have waived all
copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. Obviously
inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above.

The TPP is no simple “trade agreement.”  Fight it!
http://www.ourfairdeal.org/  time is running out!

View this message in context:
http://forum.openscad.org/Strange-problem-with-verticality-tp17969p17976.html
Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com
http://nabble.com.


OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7690 / Virus Database: 4627/12682 - Release Date:
07/25/16


OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org


OpenSCAD mailing listDiscuss@lists.openscad.orghttp://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7690 / Virus Database: 4627/12682 - Release Date: 07/25/16


OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org

I checked the stl file again with Repetier and there is no flaws like you mentioned. I would suggest you to print it again in another table position. 2016-07-25 19:25 GMT-03:00 jon <jon@jonbondy.com>: > No pulleys. Lead screws. But thanks for the thought. > > On 7/25/2016 6:05 PM, Greg Frost wrote: > > Slipping pulley. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 26 Jul 2016, at 7:31 AM, Ronaldo Persiano <rcmpersiano@gmail.com> > wrote: > > How exactly are your prints not vertical? Are they slanted, growing bigger > at each layer? Or what? > > 2016-07-25 18:35 GMT-03:00 jon <jon@jonbondy.com>: > >> Thanks for the thought, but in fact the remainder of the print is >> pristine, so that is not the problem. >> >> >> >> On 7/25/2016 5:30 PM, MichaelAtOz wrote: >> >>> Then your steppers are losing steps/skipping >>> < >>> http://machinedesign.com/motorsdrives/why-open-loop-steppers-lose-steps-and-how-solve-problem >>> > >>> ? >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Admin - PM me if you need anything, or if I've done something stupid... >>> >>> Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the >>> Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have waived all >>> copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. Obviously >>> inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above. >>> >>> The TPP is no simple “trade agreement.” Fight it! >>> http://www.ourfairdeal.org/ time is running out! >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://forum.openscad.org/Strange-problem-with-verticality-tp17969p17976.html >>> Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com >>> <http://nabble.com>. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenSCAD mailing list >>> Discuss@lists.openscad.org >>> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> No virus found in this message. >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>> Version: 2016.0.7690 / Virus Database: 4627/12682 - Release Date: >>> 07/25/16 >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenSCAD mailing list >> Discuss@lists.openscad.org >> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > Discuss@lists.openscad.org > http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing listDiscuss@lists.openscad.orghttp://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org > > > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2016.0.7690 / Virus Database: 4627/12682 - Release Date: 07/25/16 > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > Discuss@lists.openscad.org > http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org > >
P
Parkinbot
Tue, Jul 26, 2016 10:38 AM

to me this looks like some warping has happened ...

--
View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Strange-problem-with-verticality-tp17969p17986.html
Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

to me this looks like some warping has happened ... -- View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Strange-problem-with-verticality-tp17969p17986.html Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.