If this might lead someone to over-write the output from OpenSCAD with the output from PrusaSlicer, then that would be annoying.  Of course, we have no control over PrusaSlicer (other than I imagine it will at least emit a warning message).  I imagine each of us will come up with our own naming conventions On 10/20/2025 1:59 PM, Jordan Brown via Discuss wrote: > With the advent of F7 invoking the selected exporter, I thought I'd > take a stab at using 3MF as my default 3D export format. > > I immediately noticed a potential issue.  PrusaSlicer uses 3MF for its > project files.  Historically, I've exported as STL, brought that into > PrusaSlicer, then if the slicer settings were non-trivial I saved the > project using the same base name.  I can't do that now since the model > and the slicer project file end up with the same extension. > > There's nothing *wrong*, and nothing really to be done about it, but > it's an unexpected hiccup in my workflow. > > (Of course, what I *really* want is a way to embed the slicer settings > in the OpenSCAD program and directly export PrusaSlicer-compatible > project files.  But that's a pipe dream for now.) > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com