Not sure why you have problems with dimensional accuracy because objects
designed in OpenSCAD are the size I specify in the code, so I don't need to
measure them.
One thing to be aware of when making rounded objects by hulling circles,
cylinders and spheres is they should always have a multiple of 4 vertices,
so you get a vertex exactly on each axis to align with the sides of your
box. Otherwise it will be slightly too small. See
https://github.com/nophead/NopSCADlib/blob/52e9c1d7fd97555a03ea9c029887902d28aefae5/utils/core/global.scad#L69
Also I replace the OpenSCAD sphere with my own that has vertices at the
poles. See
https://github.com/nophead/NopSCADlib/blob/52e9c1d7fd97555a03ea9c029887902d28aefae5/utils/core/sphere.scad#L23
On Wed, 12 May 2021 at 11:00, Terrypin via Discuss <
discuss@lists.openscad.org> wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Terrypin T.pinnell@btinternet.com
To: discuss@lists.openscad.org
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 00:32:51 -0700 (MST)
Subject: [OpenSCAD] Re: Merging sub-assemblies?
Thanks, that tool looks fascinating. I’ll try it next time I need to
reassure myself about dimension accuracy.
Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive http://forum.openscad.org/
at Nabble.com.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Terrypin via Discuss discuss@lists.openscad.org
To: discuss@lists.openscad.org
Cc: Terrypin T.pinnell@btinternet.com
Bcc:
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 00:32:51 -0700 (MST)
Subject: [OpenSCAD] Re: Merging sub-assemblies?
OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org
/"Not sure why you have problems with dimensional accuracy because objects
designed in OpenSCAD are the size I specify in the code, so I don't need to
measure them."/
That's my aim too, but I did explain in my reply a few hours ago.
Thanks for the suggestions about hulling which I'll study. Meanwhile just
about to post my own 'hull' result.
--
Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/