Hi there,
I'm currently trying to design a jig to help me sharpen my Record #50 bead
cutters.
I was so confident about my work that I printed the result right away...
And of course, I had forgotten to setup a few tolerances here and there, so
some of the parts won't slide in each other.
Stupid me, 10 hours of printing, and most of the parts are unusable.
I changed a few things on the smaller parts and printed them, and they now
slide in.
The problem is that I should now print again the bigger parts, but that
will take ages... And maybe fail again.
So I'm about to try to extract key sub-parts of the bigger parts so that I
can try my modifications in no time.
I think I could do that with a difference between the big part, and the
difference between two cubes (with the inner cube being the volume of the
bigger part's sub-part si want to keep).
But... Do we have somewhere a library that would do the same thing ? Give
it a part, coordinates and it will return a sub-part of the part.
Thanks in advance.
Bruno Verachten
I use a module called clip() for that, see
https://github.com/nophead/NopSCADlib#Clip.
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 at 12:50, Verachten Bruno gounthar@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I'm currently trying to design a jig to help me sharpen my Record #50 bead
cutters.
I was so confident about my work that I printed the result right away...
And of course, I had forgotten to setup a few tolerances here and there, so
some of the parts won't slide in each other.
Stupid me, 10 hours of printing, and most of the parts are unusable.
I changed a few things on the smaller parts and printed them, and they now
slide in.
The problem is that I should now print again the bigger parts, but that
will take ages... And maybe fail again.
So I'm about to try to extract key sub-parts of the bigger parts so that I
can try my modifications in no time.
I think I could do that with a difference between the big part, and the
difference between two cubes (with the inner cube being the volume of the
bigger part's sub-part si want to keep).
But... Do we have somewhere a library that would do the same thing ? Give
it a part, coordinates and it will return a sub-part of the part.
Thanks in advance.
Bruno Verachten
OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
On 2/17/2021 4:49 AM, Verachten Bruno wrote:
So I'm about to try to extract key sub-parts of the bigger parts so
that I can try my modifications in no time.
I think I could do that with a difference between the big part, and
the difference between two cubes (with the inner cube being the volume
of the bigger part's sub-part si want to keep).
Maybe I'm not following, but that sounds like a job for intersection(),
not difference().
For the simple case of extracting a "cube" that's aligned on the axes,
why is it anything more than
intersection() {
mymodel();
translate([...]) cube([...]);
}
?
To make it easier to pick out the right cube interactively, you might
make it Customizer-friendly:
/* [ Extraction ] */
// Extract a cube?
extract = false;
// Origin of cube to extract?
extract_origin = [ 0, 0, 0 ];
// Size of cube to extract?
extract_size = [ 100, 100, 100 ];
if (extract) {
intersection() {
mymodel();
translate(extract_origin) cube(extract_size);
}
} else {
mymodel();
}
So I'm about to try to extract key sub-parts of the bigger parts so that I can try my modifications in no time.
I think I could do that with a difference between the big part, and the difference between two cubes (with the inner cube being the volume of the bigger part's sub-part si want to keep).
Maybe I'm not following, but that sounds like a job for intersection(), not difference().
Yes you're right, I was not crystal clear.
I use a module called clip() for that, see https://github.com/nophead/NopSCADlib#Clip.
That did the trick.
Thanks a lot for your inputs, I have since then made several attempts
with the smallest critical parts sporting my latest changes, and I
noticed a few issues... that will be solved in minutes instead of
hours.
Best regards,
Bruno