working on the dead horse, the flogging of principle, see if the attached code gives you this. (I, or someone else, can work out the angled fillet.)  You can easily see a cross section by differencing 'cube(500)'  for each item. On 16/01/2025 13:19, Jon Bondy wrote: > If we create those text files, why not allow them to also be imported, > so Raymond can send me his settings, and I can try them? > > On 1/16/2025 7:34 AM, Raymond West via Discuss wrote: >> In another thread (Re: Fillet) it became apparent that scripts that >> successfully ran on one system, did not run properly on another. I >> think it would be useful if the values entered in preferences, and >> elsewhere, could be produced as a separate text file, so that when >> these differences occur, comparisons between these settings could be >> readily made. It appears that the version number is not enough (for >> example cgal/manifold, can produce different results.) >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenSCAD mailing list >> To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org >

On 1/16/2025 12:47 PM, Raymond West via Discuss wrote: > > > working on the dead horse, the flogging of principle, see if the > attached code gives you this. (I, or someone else, can work out the > angled fillet.)  You can easily see a cross section by differencing > 'cube(500)'  for each item. > It's not the best angle for seeing the details of the fillets, but this looks pretty much the same.  From other angles the bottom-most one isn't very bevel-y; can't see what yours looks like from those angles. Windows 11, OpenSCAD 2024.12.16, preview (Manifold and CGAL look the same): Here's a better angle to see the shape of the bevels:

You can't see the internal fillet in your view, but thanks for giving it a test. I think the fl value in the script was a 5, in the image I posted, it could be a 3. The flange (fl) value can give a straight bevel, if bevel = 0, but values of fl that I've tried, with various bevels, does not particularly represent the cast/wrought iron flanges on the pipework I'm familiar with.  The fl value was only there to see if profiles (other than the 'slipping ladder' type) would be possible. I've yet to do the sums for the filleted angled joint, and the cases where the vertical diameter is smaller than the horizontal. I think that it may be better to separate those situations, at least initially. Granularity, feature creep/whatever. On 16/01/2025 22:08, Jordan Brown wrote: > On 1/16/2025 12:47 PM, Raymond West via Discuss wrote: >> >> >> working on the dead horse, the flogging of principle, see if the >> attached code gives you this. (I, or someone else, can work out the >> angled fillet.)  You can easily see a cross section by differencing >> 'cube(500)'  for each item. >> > > It's not the best angle for seeing the details of the fillets, but > this looks pretty much the same.  From other angles the bottom-most > one isn't very bevel-y; can't see what yours looks like from those angles. > > Windows 11, OpenSCAD 2024.12.16, preview (Manifold and CGAL look the > same): > > > Here's a better angle to see the shape of the bevels: