OpenSCAD 2021.01 released
Hi!
Some people may have seen it already, the release of
OpenSCAD 2021.01 happened a couple of days ago.
Here's finally the full announcement including the list
of changes:
https://www.openscad.org/news.html#20210131
All details on github:
https://github.com/openscad/openscad/releases/tag/openscad-2021.01
ciao,
Torsten.
How about we ask for general issues here first? [he says
pessimistically...wanting to guide the community]
I'll be mentioning an export filename regression, after my sleep roster...
OpenSCAD Admin - email* me if you need anything, or if I've done something stupid...
- on the Forum, click on my MichaelAtOz label, there is a link to email me.
Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. Obviously inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above.
--
Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/
Where should we report suggestions or test files?
I tend to define my files as a series of modules, with a set of tests which determine what gets modeled where, so the line #s which are pulled up are all from that testing block, not to the module in question (which would be preferable):
Pointing to the Sides module or the line it is called from (355), rather than line 342 where the overall test is would be more helpful --- the presence of the other instances makes it seem as though this could be improved:
William
-----Original Message-----
From: MichaelAtOz oz.at.michael@gmail.com
To: discuss@lists.openscad.org
Sent: Sun, Feb 7, 2021 8:47 am
Subject: Re: [OpenSCAD] OpenSCAD 2021.01 released
How about we ask for general issues here first? [he says
pessimistically...wanting to guide the community]
I'll be mentioning an export filename regression, after my sleep roster...
OpenSCAD Admin - email* me if you need anything, or if I've done something stupid...
- on the Forum, click on my MichaelAtOz label, there is a link to email me.
Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. Obviously inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above.
--
Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/
OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
big THANK YOU
to you and everyone who participated in the new version!
a new version of OpenSCAD is always a bit like christmas for me <3
Am So., 7. Feb. 2021 um 14:48 Uhr schrieb MichaelAtOz <
oz.at.michael@gmail.com>:
How about we ask for general issues here first? [he says
pessimistically...wanting to guide the community]
I'll be mentioning an export filename regression, after my sleep roster...
OpenSCAD Admin - email* me if you need anything, or if I've done
something stupid...
- on the Forum, click on my MichaelAtOz label, there is a link to email me.
Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the
Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have waived all
copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. Obviously
inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above.
--
Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/
OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
Tiny bug: In the customizer, when you have a slider, if you drag the slider,
it correctly renders the image, but if you click in the slider to step the
value, it won't. If I press F5 after clicking in the slider, it goes back to
the pre-click value.
--
Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/
On 07.02.21 14:59, William F. Adams via Discuss wrote:
Where should we report suggestions or test files?
Those should go to github once they are clear enough
to describe. That means a good explanation of what would
be expected from user side so anyone can understand the
request just by reading the posted issue.
See also:
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSCAD_User_Manual/FAQ#Reporting_bugs,_Requesting_features
ciao,
Torsten.
I have already raised a github issue that the customiser slider is broken.
I am surprised the release was made before addressing that regression.
On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 at 15:11, Torsten Paul Torsten.Paul@gmx.de wrote:
On 07.02.21 14:59, William F. Adams via Discuss wrote:
Where should we report suggestions or test files?
Those should go to github once they are clear enough
to describe. That means a good explanation of what would
be expected from user side so anyone can understand the
request just by reading the posted issue.
See also:
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSCAD_User_Manual/FAQ#Reporting_bugs,_Requesting_features
ciao,
Torsten.
OpenSCAD mailing list
Discuss@lists.openscad.org
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
OpenSCAD mailing list-2 wrote
Where should we report suggestions or test files?
I tend to define my files as a series of modules, with a set of tests
which determine what gets modeled where, so the line #s which are pulled
up are all from that testing block, not to the module in question (which
would be preferable):
Pointing to the Sides module or the line it is called from (355), rather
than line 342 where the overall test is would be more helpful --- the
presence of the other instances makes it seem as though this could be
improved:
I think the issue is that projection() extracts a slice of geometry (of
potentially many sub-bits), it would be difficult to tag particular sections
of the projection with the (potentially many) parts that contributed to its
output.
I haven't tried, but I expect minkowski() will have the same issue.
OpenSCAD Admin - email* me if you need anything, or if I've done something stupid...
- on the Forum, click on my MichaelAtOz label, there is a link to email me.
Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. Obviously inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above.
--
Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/