JL
Joseph Lenox
Fri, Feb 6, 2015 2:43 AM
Looks optional to me.
On Feb 5, 2015 7:59 PM, "Michele" <denber@mindspring.com> wrote:
> Here's a potential problem. I'm working on CGAL now. It says it needs
> LEDA
> (plus 6 more). But the download page for LEDA
> (www.algorithmic-solutions.info/fre/d5.php) only lists Linux files and
> they
> all have "i386" in their names. Is this a show-stopper for my Sparc build?
>
> For the source code, they say they want 3000 euros. Boo wah hah hah hah.
> /That's/ not gonna happen.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://forum.openscad.org/Compiling-for-64-bit-Sparc-Solaris-10-tp10741p11497.html
> Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenSCAD mailing list
> Discuss@lists.openscad.org
> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
>
J
jon
Fri, Feb 6, 2015 2:45 AM
Torsten:
Good point! There is nothing about 32 vs 64 in the Help About for the
March 2014 install that I am using.
Where would I find a Win 8 64-bit installer for the dev snapshot, please?
Jon
On 2/5/2015 3:40 PM, Torsten Paul wrote:
On 02/06/2015 03:20 AM, jon wrote:
Win 8.1, 8 GB, process grows to about 2.5 GB and then crashes
out. Not sure how I can help further. F5 works fine; F6 crashes.
Torsten:
Good point! There is nothing about 32 vs 64 in the Help About for the
March 2014 install that I am using.
Where would I find a Win 8 64-bit installer for the dev snapshot, please?
Jon
On 2/5/2015 3:40 PM, Torsten Paul wrote:
> On 02/06/2015 03:20 AM, jon wrote:
>> Win 8.1, 8 GB, process grows to about 2.5 GB and then crashes
> > out. Not sure how I can help further. F5 works fine; F6 crashes.
>>
> Are you maybe using the 32-bit version of OpenSCAD? That
> 2.5GB is suspiciously near the limit for 32-bit applications.
>
> What happens with the dev-snapshot version?
>
> ciao,
> Torsten.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenSCAD mailing list
> Discuss@lists.openscad.org
> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
>
>
>
J
jon
Fri, Feb 6, 2015 4:09 AM
Yes, I am sure that I sent you the bad code.
I just tried it on the latest. Stunning. Amazing. So, SO, SOOOO FAST.
My hat is off to you all. Wonderful.
Jon
On 2/5/2015 4:08 PM, Marius Kintel wrote:
Win 8.1, 8 GB, process grows to about 2.5 GB and then crashes out. Not sure how I can help further. F5 works fine; F6 crashes.
Yes, I am sure that I sent you the bad code.
I just tried it on the latest. Stunning. Amazing. So, SO, SOOOO FAST.
My hat is off to you all. Wonderful.
Jon
On 2/5/2015 4:08 PM, Marius Kintel wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2015, at 21:20 PM, jon <jon@jonbondy.com> wrote:
>
>> Win 8.1, 8 GB, process grows to about 2.5 GB and then crashes out. Not sure how I can help further. F5 works fine; F6 crashes.
>>
> Btw., I just tested on Win 8.1 in a 32-bit VM, and both versions of OpenSCAD worked perfectly.
> Are you sure you posted the crashing design?
>
> -Marius
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenSCAD mailing list
> Discuss@lists.openscad.org
> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
>
>
>
M
Michele
Fri, Feb 6, 2015 5:33 AM
/"Looks optional to me."/
Oops - right you are. The whole process has gotten so complex I set up a
OneNote table to keep track of all the pieces needed. I've just gotten so
used to automatically copying stuff into that I completely missed the giant
heading that said "optional". Duh.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Compiling-for-64-bit-Sparc-Solaris-10-tp10741p11502.html
Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
/"Looks optional to me."/
Oops - right you are. The whole process has gotten so complex I set up a
OneNote table to keep track of all the pieces needed. I've just gotten so
used to automatically copying stuff into that I completely missed the giant
heading that said "optional". Duh.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Compiling-for-64-bit-Sparc-Solaris-10-tp10741p11502.html
Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
MK
Marius Kintel
Fri, Feb 6, 2015 5:48 AM
Yes, I am sure that I sent you the bad code.
I just tried it on the latest. Stunning. Amazing. So, SO, SOOOO FAST.
My hat is off to you all. Wonderful.
I’m happy that was resolved - good to see our efforts pay off :)
-Marius
On Feb 5, 2015, at 23:09 PM, jon <jon@jonbondy.com> wrote:
> Yes, I am sure that I sent you the bad code.
>
> I just tried it on the latest. Stunning. Amazing. So, SO, SOOOO FAST.
>
> My hat is off to you all. Wonderful.
>
I’m happy that was resolved - good to see our efforts pay off :)
-Marius
MK
Marius Kintel
Fri, Feb 6, 2015 5:53 AM
Ouch. Switching compiler might help.
I do however have a current copy of Solaris Studio 12.4.
Is there some reason Openscad can't be compiled with that instead of gcc?
Any decent C++ compiler should do. The current code should be C++03 compatible, so given that your compiler is < 12 years old you have a decent chance. Nobody have tried though, and all dependencies are likely to have to be recompiled as I don’t think Sun’s compiler is ABI compatible with gcc.
When I do "which make" it says "GNU Make 4.1". The script says it wants
"make 3". Can I assume that gmake 4.1 satisfies "make 3”?
I’m pretty sure it will. I haven’t used GNU make 4 myself though.
-Marius
On Feb 5, 2015, at 20:00 PM, Michele <denber@mindspring.com> wrote:
> http://sourceforge.net/p/glew/bugs/267/
>
Ouch. Switching compiler might help.
> I do however have a current copy of Solaris Studio 12.4.
> Is there some reason Openscad can't be compiled with that instead of gcc?
>
Any decent C++ compiler should do. The current code should be C++03 compatible, so given that your compiler is < 12 years old you have a decent chance. Nobody have tried though, and all dependencies are likely to have to be recompiled as I don’t think Sun’s compiler is ABI compatible with gcc.
> When I do "which make" it says "GNU Make 4.1". The script says it wants
> "make 3". Can I assume that gmake 4.1 satisfies "make 3”?
I’m pretty sure it will. I haven’t used GNU make 4 myself though.
-Marius
JL
Joseph Lenox
Fri, Feb 6, 2015 7:28 AM
So you're going to get this working or die trying?
On Feb 5, 2015 11:53 PM, "Marius Kintel" marius@kintel.net wrote:
Ouch. Switching compiler might help.
I do however have a current copy of Solaris Studio 12.4.
Is there some reason Openscad can't be compiled with that instead of gcc?
Any decent C++ compiler should do. The current code should be C++03
compatible, so given that your compiler is < 12 years old you have a decent
chance. Nobody have tried though, and all dependencies are likely to have
to be recompiled as I don’t think Sun’s compiler is ABI compatible with gcc.
When I do "which make" it says "GNU Make 4.1". The script says it wants
"make 3". Can I assume that gmake 4.1 satisfies "make 3”?
So you're going to get this working or die trying?
On Feb 5, 2015 11:53 PM, "Marius Kintel" <marius@kintel.net> wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2015, at 20:00 PM, Michele <denber@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> > http://sourceforge.net/p/glew/bugs/267/
> >
> Ouch. Switching compiler might help.
>
> > I do however have a current copy of Solaris Studio 12.4.
> > Is there some reason Openscad can't be compiled with that instead of gcc?
> >
> Any decent C++ compiler should do. The current code should be C++03
> compatible, so given that your compiler is < 12 years old you have a decent
> chance. Nobody have tried though, and all dependencies are likely to have
> to be recompiled as I don’t think Sun’s compiler is ABI compatible with gcc.
>
> > When I do "which make" it says "GNU Make 4.1". The script says it wants
> > "make 3". Can I assume that gmake 4.1 satisfies "make 3”?
>
> I’m pretty sure it will. I haven’t used GNU make 4 myself though.
>
> -Marius
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenSCAD mailing list
> Discuss@lists.openscad.org
> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
>
M
MichaelAtOz
Fri, Feb 6, 2015 9:29 AM
So you're going to get this working or die trying?
Almost choked on my wine... LOL
Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the Public Domain; To the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. This work is published globally via the internet. :) Inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above.
View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Compiling-for-64-bit-Sparc-Solaris-10-tp10741p11516.html
Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Joseph Lenox wrote
> So you're going to get this working or die trying?
Almost choked on my wine... LOL
-----
Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the Public Domain; To the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. This work is published globally via the internet. :) Inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above.
The TPP is no simple “trade agreement.” Fight it! http://www.ourfairdeal.org/
--
View this message in context: http://forum.openscad.org/Compiling-for-64-bit-Sparc-Solaris-10-tp10741p11516.html
Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
JL
Joseph Lenox
Fri, Feb 6, 2015 9:45 AM
What I thought of was http://xkcd.com/349/
After spending a few hours on this project myself, he has done quite a lot.
Unfortunately there is an awful lot of work to go.
On Feb 6, 2015 3:29 AM, "MichaelAtOz" oz.at.michael@gmail.com wrote:
So you're going to get this working or die trying?
Almost choked on my wine... LOL
Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the
Public Domain; To the extent possible under law, I have waived all
copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. This work is
published globally via the internet. :) Inclusion of works of previous
authors is not included in the above.
The TPP is no simple “trade agreement.” Fight it!
--
View this message in context:
What I thought of was http://xkcd.com/349/
After spending a few hours on this project myself, he has done quite a lot.
Unfortunately there is an awful lot of work to go.
On Feb 6, 2015 3:29 AM, "MichaelAtOz" <oz.at.michael@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Joseph Lenox wrote
> > So you're going to get this working or die trying?
>
> Almost choked on my wine... LOL
>
>
>
> -----
> Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the
Public Domain; To the extent possible under law, I have waived all
copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. This work is
published globally via the internet. :) Inclusion of works of previous
authors is not included in the above.
>
> The TPP is no simple “trade agreement.” Fight it!
http://www.ourfairdeal.org/
> --
> View this message in context:
http://forum.openscad.org/Compiling-for-64-bit-Sparc-Solaris-10-tp10741p11516.html
> Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenSCAD mailing list
> Discuss@lists.openscad.org
> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
