Is it a concern that the code from:
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSCAD_User_Manual/2D_to_3D_Extrusion
rotate_extrude(convexity = 10)
translate([2, 0, 0])
circle(r = 1, $fn = 100);
when processed in the current version of PythonSCAD (9-19) or OpenSCAD nightly (9-28) has an odd appearance?
(see attached)
If one adds a global $fn definition such as:
$fn = $preview ? 32 : 256;
then the appearance is as expected.
William
The appearance looks the same as in the manual. I don’t think anything is odd about it. The manual gives another example below the one you mention, which also increases $fn of the rotation itself.
-Marius
On Sep 28, 2025, at 21:35, William F. Adams via Discuss discuss@lists.openscad.org wrote:
Is it a concern that the code from:
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSCAD_User_Manual/2D_to_3D_Extrusion
rotate_extrude(convexity = 10)
translate([2, 0, 0])
circle(r = 1, $fn = 100);
when processed in the current version of PythonSCAD (9-19) or OpenSCAD nightly (9-28) has an odd appearance?
(see attached)
If one adds a global $fn definition such as:
$fn = $preview ? 32 : 256;
then the appearance is as expected.
William
<1759109502406blob.jpg><1759109745045blob.jpg>_______________________________________________
OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org
What does "has an odd appearance" mean? I get the same result in 2021.01
as in a nightly build and the appearance seems reasonable to me and not
"odd".
On Sun, Sep 28, 2025 at 9:36 PM William F. Adams via Discuss <
discuss@lists.openscad.org> wrote:
Is it a concern that the code from:
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSCAD_User_Manual/2D_to_3D_Extrusion
rotate_extrude(convexity = 10)
translate([2, 0, 0])
circle(r = 1, $fn = 100);
when processed in the current version of PythonSCAD (9-19) or OpenSCAD
nightly (9-28) has an odd appearance?
(see attached)
If one adds a global $fn definition such as:
$fn = $preview ? 32 : 256;
then the appearance is as expected.
William
OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org
On Sunday, September 28, 2025 at 10:26:32 PM EDT, Marius Kintel marius@kintel.net wrote:
The appearance looks the same as in the manual. I don’t think anything is odd about it.
The manual gives another example below the one you mention, which also increases $fn of the rotation itself.
OIC. The image is provided first, then the code.
Nothing to see here, move along.
Thanks.
William
On 9/29/2025 3:55 AM, William F. Adams via Discuss wrote:
OIC. The image is provided first, then the code.
That is a little confusing. I rearranged it a bit and made the images
smaller so they are more likely to be displayed side-by-side. While I
was there, I tried to clean up some other stuff. Tell me what you think.