[OpenSCAD] Proposal for extensions to the OpenSCAD syntax
Torsten.Paul at gmx.de
Mon Oct 28 14:04:25 EDT 2019
On 28.10.19 09:51, nop head wrote:
> Why don't you simply define two modules foo_union()
> and foo_diff()?
That's of cause possible but means there's no way
to automatically select those.
> In conventional programming it is bonkers to have
> combine two completely different bits of code in one
> function and pass a global variable to decide which
> one is executed.
True, but if we can find a way to hide that extra
logic in a sensible way, that could make objects
easier to compose. People have asked for that all
The main question is probably if this kind of
relation can be expressed in a general, independent
from a specific design.
More information about the Discuss