[OpenSCAD] multmatrix expands the input matrix to 4x4?

nop head nop.head at gmail.com
Wed Jul 3 08:16:48 EDT 2019

The code
a 4x4 identity matrix and then for each element it looks to see if the
corresponding element exists in the passed matrix and if it does it
overwrites that entry.

So basically it tries as hard as it can to convert any shape matrix to fit.
Any element it can't find is left as the value from the identity. If the
argument isn't even a matrix it silently uses the identity.

On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 13:15, adrianv <avm4 at cornell.edu> wrote:

> boxcarmib wrote
> > I have a friend who does a lot of volunteer shareware software
> > development. His programs get downloaded about 20K
> > a month, but in the 12 years he’s been doing it, he’s gotten about $200
> in
> > total whereas on the other hand the request
> > for new features or complaints about how his programs don’t do one thing
> > or another are endless. I know for a fact he’s pretty
> > pleased when he gets that very infrequent email of thanks and/or praise.
> > So for part I try to let the developers know how much I appreciate the
> > time and effort they put into this project.
> The project I wrote and and have supported for the last 23 years is on most
> or all linux computers and also (in a very early version) on all mac
> computers.  It's kind of hard to tell how many users there are.  I've
> gotten
> exactly $0 from my efforts.   On doesn't undertake volunteer work with the
> expectation of getting money out of it.
> > Secondly… there’s cash. :) To show my support I make a (currently very
> > modest) monthly donation to OpenSCAD which
> > I hope to increase as my own resources permit. I’ve spent far more on a
> 3D
> > printer than I’ve spent using the program that
> > I consider indispensable to creating object to print on it… I don’t think
> > that’s quite right.
> >
> > Thirdly, there’s bounties and I know if I’m really serious about an
> > extension or feature, I could offer a reward. I note that some
> > feature requests with a bounty will sometimes even see others joining in
> > to up the ante and make it even more
> > worthwhile for someone with the knowledge and expertise to actually do
> the
> > work. Granted most of the bounties offered
> > seem to be in the < $50 range… but I wonder how excited one of the
> > developers might be If one were to offer something like
> > $200, $500 or $1000 for something to be implemented.
> > Something at that level might be out of my range, but I’ve been toying
> > with the idea of offering a bounty that would serve
> > as a serious thank you for the time and effort it would take for a
> feature
> > I’d very much like to see.
> I have no idea how this sort of cash award affects developers.  I mean, if
> the developers have day jobs then offering $50 for a feature that takes ten
> hours of work is sort of insulting, since it means $5/hour.   There are
> studies done about how offering money for things can shift perception and
> behavior as it moves the behavior from a friend interaction to an economic
> one.  (Do you offer your friend money to help move a piece of furniture?)
> Of course, if a developer does not have a paying job perhaps getting $50 is
> a big draw.   And I wouldn't suggest that people don't offer money if they
> choose.  But ultimately, working on a project like mine, or like OpenSCAD
> is
> volunteer work, and one must choose to do it for the interest, enjoyment,
> and/or feeling of making a contribution to the community.
> In the case of OpenSCAD, there's no roadmap that I've seen describing which
> features the developers are interested in actually implementing.  In my
> experience, if I have an idea of how the program might be improved and I
> suggest it first it's met with a kind of hostile reaction about how I
> shouldn't expect anything, and secondly, it's already been suggested many
> times by others.  I found what seemed to me to be a major bug and
> discovered
> it was already reported and had been open for years.  So all of this makes
> it seem like change is unlikely.   This is an observation, not a criticism
> of the developers.  And it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to wait around
> for the 2023 release.
> That's why the question is: what does OpenSCAD do now, so I can use it
> best?
> How does multmatrix() work?  How are we supposed to use it?  I didn't start
> this discussion to be a debate about OpenSCAD development, but rather to
> figure out how I can and should use multmatrix().   And also possibly I
> thought I might improve the manual to better describe how multmatrix()
> works, since that's something I *can* do to help others.  But it looks like
> maybe this effort is also not appreciated, or is controversial---the
> response that seems to arise for all efforts to help the OpenSCAD project.
> So I guess I won't bother.  It's pretty hard to make a contribution.
> --
> Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/
> _______________________________________________
> OpenSCAD mailing list
> Discuss at lists.openscad.org
> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openscad.org/pipermail/discuss_lists.openscad.org/attachments/20190703/7e433ba0/attachment.html>

More information about the Discuss mailing list