[OpenSCAD] 3D printing survey
lenbok at gmail.com
Fri Sep 25 16:16:17 EDT 2015
The funding of the open source projects we all love and derive benefit from
is certainly important, and it would be nice if there were an easy way for
people to e.g. subscribe $2/mo to ongoing development.
Openscad is listed on https://www.bountysource.com/teams/openscad/bounties
but I think essentially no-one has heard of it, and as a supporter you make
lump sum donations for your favourite issues (which may or may not get
worked on). It has the benefit that anyone who contributes to developing
could claim a bounty, but it's not a dead-easy system for a supporter.
Another alternative that I only heard about a few days ago is
http://www.patreon.com/, which lets people be patrons of their favourite
artists/content providers -- sort of like a monthly subscription but I
think it is linked to releases of new content (in the openscad world this
might be releases, nightly builds, commits?). E.g. this might let people
subscribe at a max of $2/month as long as development is still happening.
Presumably then there is the issue of how any funds get distributed though.
Neither sounds perfect. Perhaps the bountysource guys could add a "I don't
know or care about 'issues' but just want to support the project"
On 26 September 2015 at 00:46, jon <jon at jonbondy.com> wrote:
> One more, and then I will stop.
> SketchUp provides a perpetual license to me for the software I paid for,
> but I can stop funding them and not get access to their newer technology.
> Seems fair to me. And to them. They have an incentive to give me
> must-have features, and I get to decide whether those features are worth
> what they are asking.
> We are used to everything being free on the web, but that is not a model
> that can fund the development of some of the products that we love. It
> makes sense to me to pay a modest fee to ensure that products like OpenSCAD
> continue to grow and improve.
> The SketchUp model provides free access to most features, with payment
> needed to use some of the high-end features.
> Perhaps rather than simply saying "reviled" we might want to explore, as a
> community, how to fund OpenSCAD in a way that is acceptable to the majority
> of us
> On 9/25/2015 8:32 AM, Tim Hawkins wrote:
> We have just been through the same situation with jetbrains, who produce
> development tools, they attempted to shift to a subscription model that
> shuts down the product when you stopped paying. Several 100 customers put
> them straight. They have backed off and now provide perpetual licenses
> Thier move was universaly reviled.....
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015, 20:24 jon < <jon at jonbondy.com>jon at jonbondy.com>
>> "This kind of business model is called "rent seeking" and is universaly
>> Strong words for a personal opinion.
>> On 9/25/2015 3:51 AM, Tim Hawkins wrote:
>> Agreed, i told it i own a printer (3 in fact), and it immeadatly asked me
>> about how i rent or buy printing services, i said i dont, it then asked
>> about which online services do i print with, i said none because i own a
>> printer. The subscription section was even more annoying and nonsensicle,
>> it asked me if i subscribe to any services, i said none. It then asked how
>> much i spend per month on subscriptions, did i not just say none, and then
>> to rub in the fact was not actualy interested in my opinion, it asked how
>> much i would pay for a subscription. Guess what the answer is......
>> This kind of business model is called "rent seeking" and is universaly
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015, 15:27 < <arnholm at arnholm.org>arnholm at arnholm.org>
>>> On 2015-09-25 06:59, Tim Hawkins wrote:
>>> > Marius, the survey spends a lot of time discussing subscriptions. The
>>> > moment i saw that i lost interest in the product. I and many other
>>> > people will never buy a subscription product because it allows a
>>> > vendor to hold customers hostage.
>>> Hear, hear. I agree 100%
>>> I started the survey, but it asked a lot of intrusive and frankly stupid
>>> questions, so after several minutes I gave up and abandoned it. For
>>> example it asked me if I owned a printer, to which I replied yes and I
>>> use it at home. Then it continued for several questions asking why and
>>> how I use printing services, even though I tried to tell it I have no
>>> intention of using such things. There were also other things that I
>>> reacted upon, but to keep it short I have left it out. I question if
>>> this is a useful survey as it easily alienates people.
>>> I will only use software that allows me to run it off-line and on as
>>> many computers as I like. I will not accept software that collects
>>> information about me or my activities. I do enjoy OpenSCAD the way it is
>>> and hope focus will be on improving it, i.e. making it more flexible,
>>> Carsten Arnholm
>>> OpenSCAD mailing list
>>> Discuss at lists.openscad.org
>> OpenSCAD mailing listDiscuss at lists.openscad.orghttp://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2015.0.6140 / Virus Database: 4431/10694 - Release Date: 09/24/15
>> OpenSCAD mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.openscad.org
> OpenSCAD mailing listDiscuss at lists.openscad.orghttp://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2015.0.6140 / Virus Database: 4431/10697 - Release Date: 09/25/15
> OpenSCAD mailing list
> Discuss at lists.openscad.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Discuss